Connie's next step should be
Not - go back and revisit her plan objectives
Maybe - Conduct primary research and analyze Fred's current customers.
<h3><u>
Explanation:</u></h3>
It is very essential for an entrepreneur who decides to start a new business to have a business plan that helps him in setting up the businesses in the right track and usage of funds in an effective manner. A business plan acts as a blue print of a new business and the objectives and resource utilization.
In the scenario give, Fred decides to start a new boutique and has conducted researches geographic locations and the type of boutiques supported by the demography. She must not then go back and review her plan objectives as she has decided to start it with a good plan and she may conduct a primary research about the current customers of him.
Answer:
Procedural justice
Explanation:
Procedural justice is centered on the idea that there should be fairness in the process used in making decision or resolving disputes in a transparent way without being impartial, to ensure the process brings out the right outcomes.
Jessica believes that there’s a problem with the firm’s procedural justice as she believes her firm’s process and methods in determining increase in her salary is not fair enough.
Answer:
Tariff of 1832
Explanation:
The Tariff of 1832 was enacted to replace the 1828 import tariffs commonly known as Tariffs of Abomination. Most southern states did not like it, but its greatest opposition came from South Carolina since its economy depended greatly in foreign trade. Back then America's largest export was cotton produced by southern states.
Due to South Carolina's extreme opposition, it was replaced by the Compromise Tariff of 1833. This last tariff would gradually decrease the tax rates until they fell back to 1816 levels, which was approximately 20%.
The Nullification Crisis refers to a legal process carried out in South Carolina that determined that federal taxes, specifically import tariffs were unconstitutional and shouldn't apply to them. The problem is that the Supreme Court decides what is unconstitutional or not, not a state court.
Answer:
15.68%
Explanation:
Now to get the expected return of the portfolio, we need to find the return of the portfolio in each state of the economy. This portfolio is a special case since all three assets have the same weight. To find the expected return in an equally weighted portfolio, we can sum the returns of each asset and the we divide it by the number of assets, so the expected return of the portfolio in each state of the economy will be :
Boom: RP= (.13 + .21 + .39) / 3 = .2433, or 24.33%
Bust: RP= (.15 + .05 −.06) / 3 = .0467, or 4.67%
Now to get the expected return of the portfolio, we multiply the return in each state of the economy by the probability of that state occurring, and then sum. In so doing, we get
E(RP) = .56(.2433) + .44(.0467)
=.1568, or 15.68%
