Answer:
The correct answer to the following question will be "Miranda v. Arizona
".
Explanation:
- During this case, the Supreme Court held that offenders who were arrested must always be told regarding their constitutional right to such an advocate as well as against actualization-incrimination after interrogation.
- This allowed suspected offenders to consult their rights and freedoms before being interviewed while being in detention by the officers.
The attitude of Fernando is best explained by the cognitive dissonance theory which is the one responsible for the person to gain the consistency with their beliefs, opinions, etc. With Fernando's attitude of changing from capital punishment to opposing argument best describes the said theory.
<u>The exchange rate of April 3, 2013 from 1 Euro to Yen was at: 119,4065 </u>
The answer is C, as soon as possible to facilitate accountability of the resources.
