Answer:
Option B. Treasury Stock for $1,200
Explanation:
The reason is that when 1,000 shares which has $2 par value and were issued at $10 per share, the journal entry was:
Dr Cash Account $10,000
Cr Common Stock $2,000
Cr Paid In Capital $8,000
But when 100 shares were repurchased at $12 per share, then the accounting treatment would be
Dr Treasury Stock $1,200
Cr Cash Account $1,200
So the correct option is option B.
Answer:
A) R(x) = 120x - 0.5x^2
B) P(x) = - 0.75x^2 + 120x - 2500
C) 80
D) 2300
E) 80
Explanation:
Given the following :
Price of suit 'x' :
p = 120 - 0.5x
Cost of producing 'x' suits :
C(x)=2500 + 0.25 x^2
A) calculate total revenue 'R(x)'
Total Revenue = price × total quantity sold, If total quantity sold = 'x'
R(x) = (120 - 0.5x) * x
R(x) = 120x - 0.5x^2
B) Total profit, 'p(x)'
Profit = Total revenue - Cost of production
P(x) = R(x) - C(x)
P(x) = (120x - 0.5x^2) - (2500 + 0.25x^2)
P(x) = 120x - 0.5x^2 - 2500 - 0.25x^2
P(x) = - 0.5x^2 - 0.25x^2 + 120x - 2500
P(x) = - 0.75x^2 + 120x - 2500
C) To maximize profit
Find the marginal profit 'p' (x)'
First derivative of p(x)
d/dx (p(x)) = - 2(0.75)x + 120
P'(x) = - 1.5x + 120
-1.5x + 120 = 0
-1.5x = - 120
x = 120 / 1.5
x = 80
D) maximum profit
P(x) = - 0.75x^2 + 120x - 2500
P(80) = - 0.75(80)^2 + 120(80) - 2500
= -0.75(6400) + 9600 - 2500
= -4800 + 9600 - 2500
= 2300
E) price per suit in other to maximize profit
P = 120 - 0.5x
P = 120 - 0.5(80)
P = 120 - 40
P = $80
Answer:
Short run aggregate supply curve is flat ( A )
Explanation:
The special case of the AS-AD following the IS-LM is that the short run aggregate supply curve is flat
This is because in an AS-AD model the price level is constant and AD represents an equilibrium point along IS-LM model, hence the price been constant, shows that in short run aggregate supply curve will be flat.
Answer:
d, all states, as no state requires at least two members to create an LLC
Explanation:
The requisite of two members to create an LLC was removed from all states in the USA. Now, all states allow a single-member LLC. Massachussets was the last one to eliminate that requisite in 2003.
Maybe this change in laws was because owners cheated on that requisite by placing as the two members (owners) a man and his wife, or a woman and her husband, or some other person (in direct relation with the owner) which was just placing the name but the company actually belonged to only one member.
