Options:
A. claim of fact
B. claim of definition
C. claim of policy
D<span>. claim of value
The answer would be option D "</span>claim of value." A claim of value is a claim that is used when a person makes a judgment, express approval or disapproval, or attempt to prove that some action, belief, or condition is right or wrong<span>. So, in this case the person is saying is wrong to vote which is stating's that this is wrong which would mean it's a claim of value.
Hope this helps!</span>
Optimism is a cognitive process of looking at situations with favorable expectations of the future.
Answer
Pull factor in migration
Explanation
A pull factor best describes things that attracts people to a country, a religion ,an organization, a region e.t.c Native Americans who were the people who discovered and lived in the America very many years ago. They were promised new lands in the west where they would be protected from land-hungry homesteaders which in migration is considered as a pull factor in migration .Migration is a global phenomenon which is caused by economic and social political, cultural, environmental, health, education and transportation factors. Pull factors in migration are the positive aspects that attract immigrants .They include better education and job prospects,political stability and religious freedom.
There are a few ways that this can be done. I will list the ones I know off the top of my head, as this is a broad question. I will be describing this as if the reader is a political scientist so don't take it personally, it's just so you can better understand.
Cherry Picking: Say you want to get a poll. Don't go to an area where there is a majority of the working class. You wan't to go to areas that are high on welfare, stock brokers, corporate etc. You can best find these in big cities like New York, Orlando, so on. That way, when people see the polls, they will look at what are demographic is, giving them the sense that we are popular party.
Fabrication: Don't worry about the legitimacy. Most people just want some sort of facts or explanation, and if we make one up that it is believable for most people, we are good. So long as they don't look at the actual ice caps and the temperature around the world, as far as they know Global Warming is a thing, *cough* I mean, sorry not Global Warming, Climate Change, it's totally different *wink, wink*.
Censorship: So long as no one sees any contradicting evidence to our polls, they are good. Same thing with Climate Change. If however something does come up we need to treat is as if it is absurd. Conspiracy theorist! But even then we need to make sure that it stays away from public eye, and public opinion.
Hope this helps, don't want to keep you waiting much longer.
