Answer:
A. 0.5
B. 0.32
C. 0.75
Step-by-step explanation:
There are
- 28 students in the Spanish class,
- 26 in the French class,
- 16 in the German class,
- 12 students that are in both Spanish and French,
- 4 that are in both Spanish and German,
- 6 that are in both French and German,
- 2 students taking all 3 classes.
So,
- 2 students taking all 3 classes,
- 6 - 2 = 4 students are in French and German, bu are not in Spanish,
- 4 - 2 = 2 students are in Spanish and German, but are not in French,
- 12 - 2 = 10 students are in Spanish and French but are not in German,
- 16 - 2 - 4 - 2 = 8 students are only in German,
- 26 - 2 - 4 - 10 = 10 students are only in French,
- 28 - 2 - 2 - 10 = 14 students are only in Spanish.
In total, there are
2 + 4 + 2 + 10 + 8 + 10 +14 = 50 students.
The classes are open to any of the 100 students in the school, so
100 - 50 = 50 students are not in any of the languages classes.
A. If a student is chosen randomly, the probability that he or she is not in any of the language classes is
B. If a student is chosen randomly, the probability that he or she is taking exactly one language class is
C. If 2 students are chosen randomly, the probability that both are not taking any language classes is
So, the probability that at least 1 is taking a language class is
Answer:
Hierarchical layers of abstraction in computers are used to hide information and manage deep functionality by allowing the separation to facilitate platform independence.
Step-by-step explanation:
Hierarchical layers of abstraction in computers:
Hierarchical layers of abstraction in computers are used to hide information and manage deep functionality by allowing the separation to facilitate platform independence.
In Hierarchical layers, users work independently at each level of the hierarchy.
example:
Abstraction in computing is language abstraction
Development of programming languages from machine language to assembly language and then high-level language is an example of Hierarchical layers of abstraction. Here each stage is a base for the next stage.
C. 1/5,2/5,3/5,4/5 and 1 since all will be on the same mark as 2/10,4/10,6/10,8/10 and 10/10.
d. there would be 10/10 for every 0 to 2.
Answer:
Total eclipse was 
minutes longer than in 2005.
Step-by-step explanation:
It is given in the question that total eclipse in 2003 lasted 
minutes and in 2005 it lasted 3/8 of a minute.
We have to calculate how much longer did it last in 2003.
So we have to subtract the duration in 2003 by duration in 2005
Total time taken in 2003- total time taken in 2005
minutes
1 - 2/3 - 1/12 = 3/12 reduced = 1/4
Jerry saved 1/4 of his money.
