Answer:
Karl Marx and Max Weber were two German sociologists who wrote extensively about social stratification in modern capitalist societies. However, their methods and conclusions were very different. Marx saw class struggle as the most important factor, while Weber rejected Marx's ideas and had a more nuanced approach to social stratification.
Explanation:
For Karl Marx, social stratification was a consequence of the division of society in social classes. These classes are divided by their relationship to the means of production. In other words, by the place they occupy in the economy. Marx argued that there are two main classes: the bourgeoisie, which sits above the rest of society because they own the means of production, and the proletariat, who own no means of production and must sell their labour power to the bourgeoisie in order to make a living. In short, whether one owns or not the material means of life is the most important factor in social stratification.
Max Weber, on the other hand, considered Marx's explanation lacking. He considered that social stratification went beyond who owned the means of production, and considered that there are three dimensions to social class which determine one's place in society: power, which means how much one is able to influence the behaviour of others; economic inequality, which refers to how much wealth one owns with respect to others; and social status, which is a more diffuse understanding of how one's own worth is perceived by others. Weber considered that these three dimensions together better explained social stratification than relations of production alone.
Given what has been said, we can note two key differences between Marx and Weber. Marx was a materialist philosopher, in the sense that for him material differences were the primary factor, while social and psychological factors were determined by the material factor. For Weber, the material factor was only one of many, and certainly not the most important. This leads to the second difference. Marx considered that class struggle, the conflict between the owning class and the working classes, was the driving force of history. Weber on the other hand, saw class struggle as more diluted and nowere as crucial and important as Marx saw it.
The answer is B because it makes sense
Answer:
No but those that live as travelling Traders are the Nomads
Explanation:
A nomad is an individual from a community without fixed home which routinely moves to and from similar territories. Such gatherings incorporate hunter-gatherers, pastoral nomads (owning livestock), and tinkers or trader nomads. In the 20th century, populace of Nomads gradually diminished, coming to an expected 30–40 million wanderers on the planet starting at 1995.
A Nomad is an individual with no settled home, moving here and there as a method of acquiring food, discovering field for domesticated animals, or in any case earning enough to pay the rent.
Migrant chasing and assembling following occasionally accessible wild plants and game is by a long shot the most established human means strategy. Pastoralists raise groups, driving or going with in examples that typically try not to drain pastures past their capacity to recuperate.
Nomadism is additionally a way of life adjusted to barren areas, for example, steppe, tundra, or ice and sand, where versatility is the most productive procedure for misusing scant assets
it is when we learn in home instead at school
Answer: See explanation
Explanation:
Voluntary exchange is simply referred to as an act whereby both the buyers and the sellers can engage in transactions in the market freely.
Voluntary exchange is a fundamental assumption made by neoclassical economics which forms the basis of contemporary mainstream economics.
According to the principle, people act based on their interest. In a scenario whereby the individuals believe that they will not gain from a particular transaction, they won't engage in such.
