1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
pashok25 [27]
2 years ago
15

IM BEGGING SOMEONE!!! PLZ HELP IM SO CONFUSED

Mathematics
2 answers:
valentinak56 [21]2 years ago
5 0

Answer:

what grade really quick

Step-by-step explanation:

eimsori [14]2 years ago
5 0

Answer:

See below.

Step-by-step explanation:

Part A:

The two lines have the same slope and different y-intercepts. The graphs of the two equations are parallel lines, so there is no solution.

Part B:

The two lines are really the same line with the same slope and y-intercept. Therefore every point on the line is a solution. There is an infinite number of solutions.

Part C.

The two lines have different slopes, so they intersect at a single point. Therefore, there is one solution.

You might be interested in
If you bought m yogurt cups at $2 each and paid with $50 what is your change
IceJOKER [234]
Change = 50 - 2m

hope it helps
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Suppose we are testing people to see if the rate of use of seat belts has changed from a previous value of 88%. Suppose that in
Andreas93 [3]

Answer:

a) We would expect to see 500*0.88=440

b) z=\frac{0.9 -0.88}{\sqrt{\frac{0.88(1-0.88)}{500}}}=1.376  

p_v =2*P(Z>1.376)=0.167  

So the p value obtained was a very high value and using the significance level assumed \alpha=0.05 we have p_v>\alpha so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis, and we can said that at 5% of significance the true proportion is not significant different from 0.9.

The p value is a criterion to decide if we reject or not the null hypothesis, when p_v we reject the null hypothesis in other case we FAIL to reject the null hypothesis. And represent the "probability of obtaining the observed results of a test, assuming that the null hypothesis is correct".  

Step-by-step explanation:

Data given and notation

n=500 represent the random sample taken

X=450 represent the people that have the seat belt fastened

\hat p=\frac{450}{500}=0.9 estimated proportion of people that have the seat belt fastened

p_o=0.88 is the value that we want to test

\alpha represent the significance level

z would represent the statistic (variable of interest)

p_v{/tex} represent the p value (variable of interest)  Part aWe would expect to see 500*0.88=440Part bConcepts and formulas to use  We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to test the claim that the true proportion changes fro m 0.88.:  Null hypothesis:[tex]p=0.88  

Alternative hypothesis:p \neq 0.88  

When we conduct a proportion test we need to use the z statisitc, and the is given by:  

z=\frac{\hat p -p_o}{\sqrt{\frac{p_o (1-p_o)}{n}}} (1)  

The One-Sample Proportion Test is used to assess whether a population proportion \hat p is significantly different from a hypothesized value p_o.

Calculate the statistic  

Since we have all the info requires we can replace in formula (1) like this:  

z=\frac{0.9 -0.88}{\sqrt{\frac{0.88(1-0.88)}{500}}}=1.376  

Statistical decision  

It's important to refresh the p value method or p value approach . "This method is about determining "likely" or "unlikely" by determining the probability assuming the null hypothesis were true of observing a more extreme test statistic in the direction of the alternative hypothesis than the one observed". Or in other words is just a method to have an statistical decision to fail to reject or reject the null hypothesis.  

The significance level assumed is \alpha=0.05. The next step would be calculate the p value for this test.  

Since is a bilateral test the p value would be:  

p_v =2*P(Z>1.376)=0.167  

So the p value obtained was a very high value and using the significance level assumed \alpha=0.05 we have p_v>\alpha so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis, and we can said that at 5% of significance the true proportion is not significant different from 0.9.

The p value is a criterion to decide if we reject or not the null hypothesis, when p_v we reject the null hypothesis in other case we FAIL to reject the null hypothesis. And represent the "probability of obtaining the observed results of a test, assuming that the null hypothesis is correct".  

8 0
3 years ago
HELP MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!
kiruha [24]

Answer:

b

i did this before xD

6 0
3 years ago
Add 3 feet 6 inches +8 feet 2 inches +4 inches +2feet 5 inches
enyata [817]
You will just get 18 feet 3inches or 18.3 feet
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Find the indefinite integral using the substitution x = 10 sin(θ). (Use C for the constant of integration.) 1 (100 − x2)3/2 dx
soldi70 [24.7K]

Answer:

The indefinite integral

= \frac{1}{100} ˣ \frac{x}{\sqrt{100-x^{2} } } ⁺ C

Step-by-step explanation:

x= 10sinθ

dx = 10cosθdθ

the step-to-step explanation is in the attachment

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Please help with this question
    9·2 answers
  • 5<4n=2>3n please help
    9·1 answer
  • UW = m and WX = y + 14 Write an expression for UX.
    6·1 answer
  • What is the value of (-3)^3
    7·2 answers
  • How to write 10.7 in written form
    11·1 answer
  • LOTS OF POINTS MATH QUESTION
    12·2 answers
  • Find the unit price. Round your answer to the nearest cent.
    13·2 answers
  • Keiva made $96 in necklace sales and half that amount in bracelet sales. How much money did Keiva make in necklace and bracelet
    6·1 answer
  • Which one is the correct answer..pls HELP a answer accurately..
    14·2 answers
  • Christina​'s time for a race was 26.3 seconds. Another​ runner's time was 8.44 seconds faster. Write and evaluate an equation wi
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!