1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
givi [52]
3 years ago
8

Jon is a cash-basis taxpayer and has adjusted gross income of $40,000 in 2018. During the year he incurred and paid the followin

g medical expenses. How much medical expense can he deduct as itemized deduction
Business
1 answer:
fiasKO [112]3 years ago
7 0

Complete Question:

Jon is a cash-basis taxpayer and has adjusted gross income of $40,000 in 2018. During the year he incurred and paid the following medical expenses.

Drugs and medicines prescribed by doctors $300

Health insurance premiums $750

Doctors' fees $2,250

Eyeglasses $75

How much medical expense can he deduct as itemized deduction?

Answer:

Jon

Medical expense that Jon can deduct as itemized deduction:

= $375

Explanation:

a) Data and Calculations:

Adjusted gross income = $40,000

Incurred medical expenses:

Drugs and medicines prescribed by doctors $300

Health insurance premiums $750

Doctors' fees $2,250

Eyeglasses $75

Total  = $3,375

Under Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA), the medical expenses which can be deducted as an itemized deduction on the federal income tax return are only to the extent that they exceed 7.5% of adjusted gross income (AGI).

7.5% of $40,000 = $3,000

Therefore, Jon can itemize deduction of $375 in medical expense.

You might be interested in
14. in 2018, cities including seattle and san francisco passed laws banning the use of plastic disposable straws because they ar
mr Goodwill [35]

In the above situation, the potential costs that may be derived will be,

  1. Straws made of alternative materials lack the flexibility of plastic straws. This makes it harder for people with disabilities, seniors, and children to use them.
  2. Compostable straws are an alternative to disposable straws. For compostable straws to break down properly they need to be disposed of in a special commercial composter, an infrastructure that needs to be created.
  3. Alternatives to disposable straws do not need fossil fuels to be recycled.

Therefore, the options B, C and D hold true.

<h3>What is the significance of potential costs?</h3>

The potential costs can be referred to or considered as the costs that may have a contingency of being incurred by a producer upon the effects of some external factors.

Therefore, the options B, C and D holds true and states regarding the significance of potential costs.

Learn more about potential costs here:

brainly.com/question/10963256

#SPJ4

The question seems to be incomplete. It has been added below for better reference.

14. In 2018, cities including Seattle and San Francisco passed laws banning the use of plastic disposable straws because they are harmful to the environment (because plastic does not easily biodegrade) and to marine life (which ingest straws that end up in the ocean). Opponents point out that such bans may result in unintended monetary cost as well as external cost.

Which of the following describes potential costs that may arise as a result of these new laws? Select all that apply.

A. Alternatives to plastic straws cost at least 10 times more than the current price of plastic straws.

b. Straws made of alternative materials lack the flexibility of plastic straws. This makes it harder for people with disabilities, seniors, and children to use them.

C. Compostable straws are an alternative to disposable straws. For compostable straws to break down properly they need to be disposed of in a special commercial composter, an infrastructure that needs to be created.

D. Alternatives to disposable straws do not need fossil fuels to be recycled.

4 0
2 years ago
For consideration, Hazel orally promises to pay Jill $750 a month, on the first day of every month, for as long as Jill lives. H
Aliun [14]

Answer:

Hazel will have to pay Jill $750 for his remaining life because Hazel had received something which is very expensive in return in compensation of his lifetime monthly payments of $750 to Jill. So this means that the 100% contract is enforceable.

The contract formation can be proved in the court because when Hazel will say that the contract is not written so according to Statute of Fraud he is not liable to pay Jill. This means he is agreeing at the point that the contract was in place.

6 0
3 years ago
Many demographers predict that the United States will have zero populationgrowth in the twenty-first century, in contrast to ave
Fed [463]

Answer:

Check the explanation

Explanation:

  • The foremost thing is to first consider steady states. The Sluggish population growth rate swings in the line representing population growth and depreciation to the downward trend.
  • The new stable rate has a superior level of capital per worker thereby having a higher level of output per worker.
  • In Steady state, the entire output develops at rate n, whereas the output rate per worker grows at figure 0. Hence, slower population growth will hamper the figure of total output growth, but the rate of per-worker output growth will be the same.
  • Now reflect on the transition. We know that the constant-state level of output per worker is higher with little population growth. Hence, for the period of the transition to the new steady state, output per worker should grow at a rate faster than 0 for a sometime.

7 0
3 years ago
Two investment opportunities are as follows:________. Alt A Alt B First Cost 200 100 Uniform annual benefit 32 27 End of useful
Talja [164]

Answer:

Since the 4.34 NPV of Alt A is greater than the 2.35 NPV of Alt B, it therefore implies that Alt A should be selected.

Explanation:

Note: The data in the question are merged together. They are therefore sorted before answering the question as follows:

                                                          Alt A              Alt B

First Cost                                           200                 100

Uniform annual benefit                       32                   27

End of useful life salvage value         20                    0

Useful life, in years                              10                     5

The explanation to the answer is now given as follows:

a. Calculation of NPV of Alt A

First Cost = 200

PV of uniform annual benefit = P * ((1 - (1 / (1 + r))^n) / r) ……………………. (2)

Where;

P = uniform annual benefit = 32

r = MACC = 10%, or 0.10

n = number of useful years = 10

Note: The formula for calculating the present value of ordinary annuity is being used here to calculate the Present Value (PV) of uniform annual benefit.

Substitute the values into equation (1) to have:

PV of uniform annual benefit = 32 * ((1 - (1 / (1 + 0.10))^10) / 0.10) = 32 * 6.14456710570468 = 196.63

PV of Salvage value = FV / (1 + r)^n ..................... (2)

Where;

FV = End of useful life salvage value = 20

r = MACC = 10%, or 0.10

n = number of useful years = 10

Note: The normal formula for calculating the present value (PV) is being used here to calculate the PV of Salvage value

Substitute the values into equation (2) to have:

PV of Salvage value = 20 / (1 + 0.10)^10 = 20 / 2.5937424601 = 7.71

Net present value (NPV) of Alt .A = PV of uniform annual benefit + PV of Salvage value - First cost = 196.63 + 7.71 - 200 = 4.34

b. Calculation of NPV of Alt B

First Cost = 100

PV of uniform annual benefit = P * ((1 - (1 / (1 + r))^n) / r) ……………………. (3)

Where;

P = uniform annual benefit = 27

r = MACC = 10%, or 0.10

n = number of useful years = 5

Note: The formula for calculating the present value of ordinary annuity is also being used here to calculate the Present Value (PV) of uniform annual benefit.

Substitute the values into equation (3) to have:

PV of uniform annual benefit = 27 * ((1 - (1 / (1 + 0.10))^5) / 0.10) = 27 * 3.79078676940845 = 102.35

NPV of Alt B = PV of uniform annual benefit - First cost = 102.35 – 100 = 2.35

c. Decision

Since the 4.34 NPV of Alt A is greater than the 2.35 NPV of Alt B, it therefore implies that Alt A should be selected.

6 0
3 years ago
Select all parts that should be included in a resume.
Lady_Fox [76]

Answer:

Objective , contact information, work experience, education and training, education and training, name.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Owens Finest Mattress Co., Inc. decided to employ an anti-mission statement. Which of the following phrases did they use?
    13·2 answers
  • The research of robert siegler and eric jenkins on the development of the counting-on strategy is an example of _____ design.
    5·1 answer
  • Jessica is investing in a capital equipment for her printing press. She wants to know how long it will take for her investment t
    8·1 answer
  • Suppose the production of cotton causes substantial environmental damage because the pesticides used by cotton farmers often mak
    12·1 answer
  • Becker &amp; smith, cpas, and its client, troper lighting, are discussing a possible advisory engagement in which the firm would
    7·1 answer
  • A company will need ​$60 comma 00060,000 in 88 years for a new addition. To meet this​ goal, the company deposits money in an ac
    12·1 answer
  • Cover Board Inc. is a company that designs and prints advertisements on coffee sleeves used on cups sold in coffee shops. To fin
    12·2 answers
  • A fast-food restaurant buys hamburger buns from a national bakery supplier. The daily usage of buns at the restaurant is normall
    14·1 answer
  • (02.10 LC) What strategy works best to get out of a rut?
    11·2 answers
  • The production possibilities curve is bowed out (curve) because
    7·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!