Answer:
525
Step-by-step explanation:
multiply 1250 by the decimal form of the percentage (42% turns to .42)
The correct answer is:
C. They are similar because the corresponding sides of kites KELY and BRAD all have the relationship 2:1.
Using the distance formula,

the lengths of the sides of BRAD are:

The lengths of the sides of KELY are:

Each side of KELY is twice the length of the corresponding side on BRAD. This makes the ratio of the sides 2:1 and the figures are similar.
Answer:
its A
Step-by-step explanation:
Step-by-step explanation:

In this case we have:
Δx = 3/n
b − a = 3
a = 1
b = 4
So the integral is:
∫₁⁴ √x dx
To evaluate the integral, we write the radical as an exponent.
∫₁⁴ x^½ dx
= ⅔ x^³/₂ + C |₁⁴
= (⅔ 4^³/₂ + C) − (⅔ 1^³/₂ + C)
= ⅔ (8) + C − ⅔ − C
= 14/3
If ∫₁⁴ f(x) dx = e⁴ − e, then:
∫₁⁴ (2f(x) − 1) dx
= 2 ∫₁⁴ f(x) dx − ∫₁⁴ dx
= 2 (e⁴ − e) − (x + C) |₁⁴
= 2e⁴ − 2e − 3
∫ sec²(x/k) dx
k ∫ 1/k sec²(x/k) dx
k tan(x/k) + C
Evaluating between x=0 and x=π/2:
k tan(π/(2k)) + C − (k tan(0) + C)
k tan(π/(2k))
Setting this equal to k:
k tan(π/(2k)) = k
tan(π/(2k)) = 1
π/(2k) = π/4
1/(2k) = 1/4
2k = 4
k = 2
Answer: D.) This is an example of inductive reasoning because a general conclusion is reached based on a specific example,
Step-by-step explanation: Inductive reasoning simply refers to making conclusion about a specific subject or topic from patterns or insights derived from related examples. In the scenario above, the conclusion reached encompasses the overall full time 4 years college student. However, this conclusion was inferred based on a specific example comprising of only a randomized sample of 1200 full time 4 years college students in 100 campuses. random. The example failed to incorporate every student, Hence, the conclusion is induced as the choice of a sample of students may not convey the choice or decision of all.
Deductive reasoning meanwhile follows that a generally established fact is used to make conclusion about a specific example.