‘Sometimes we are limited more by attitude than by opportunities.’ Comment on the given statement.

1 answer:

4 0

Answer: Attitude is what builds up the character of an individual. If you want to know how someone would act or behave on a particular event, job or situation is through their attitude you would know

Explanation:

Attitude is what builds up the character of an individual. If you want to know how someone would act or behave on a particular event, job or situation is through their attitude you would know.

Attitude refers to a set of emotions, beliefs, and behaviors toward a particular object, person, thing, or event. Attitudes are result of experience or upbringing, and they can have a powerful influence over behavior. In most scenario environment, events, movies, experiences play a key role in the attitude of an individual.

Sometimes we are limited by our attitude than opportunities. Opportunities may come often or once a while but what determines them staying is our attitude towards them or during them

You might be interested in

The first step of the career planning process is to:

kaheart [24]

Answer: The first step of the career planning process is to:

a. evaluate the job market.

Explanation: By evaluating the job market, you would be able to make effective planning for the specific job opportunity that would be of benefit to your career.

7 0

3 years ago

What kind of investors would best meet the needs of the Nigerian economy

Orlov [11]

The type of investors are oil investors, gold, and energy

6 0

3 years ago

Early in his Presidency, Abraham Lincoln declared that his primary goal as President was to A) preserve the Union. B) encourage

slega [8]

<em>I would say A, because he did not support nor hate slavery, but wanted to keep the country together.</em>

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

2.) Each half of Earth is called<br> Social studies

MakcuM [25]

The halves of the earth are called hemispheres

3 0

3 years ago

What was the court’s majority opinion in Plessy v. Ferguson?

anygoal [31]

Answer:The court’s decision ruled that the laws of Louisiana were not in conflict with the Constitution. The justices wrote that Plessy’s defense wrongly assumed that separate facilities somehow made one race automatically inferior to another.

Further, they ruled that if one race is already socially inferior to another, there was nothing that the Constitution or other acts of legislation could do to fix that. To this end, the majority opinion states that the Fourteenth Amendment “could not have been intended to abolish distinctions based upon color, or to enforce social, as distinguished from political, equality, or a commingling of the two races upon terms unsatisfactory to either.”

Explanation: This comes directly from the answer.

6 0

3 years ago