Answer:
$12.5(at least) would be needed to induce Lisa for driving Uber instead of working on web designing.
Explanation:
Lisa makes $25 per job on web designing from her home and in the first hour she can complete 2 additional jobs. But as per the question by the eight hour she can only do .5 jobs which means that for the eight hour she would earn -
.5 x $25 = $12.5 ( per job she gets $25)
So if Lisa goes on doing work as uber driver she is going to loose $12.5 in the eight hour , so we can say that if Lisa is offered $12.5 hourly rate to work as cab driver then she is not going to miss out on the money she would have made as web designer from home.
The three financial ratios that constitute return on revenue are Cost of goods sold/Revenue, Research and Development expense/Revenue, and Selling, general, & administrative expense/Revenue.
What ism financial ratios?
Financial ratios are instrument used by companies to make comparison or to measure the relationship between different financial statement information or data.
Hence, the three financial ratios that constitute return on revenue are:
- Cost of goods sold/Revenue
- Research & Development expense/Revenue
- Selling, general, & administrative expense/Revenue
Learn more about financial ratios here:brainly.com/question/9091091
#SPJ1
Answer:
The First Bank loan has an effective rate of 7.98 percent.
Explanation:
we calcualte the effective rate for both loand and check which statement is correct.
<u>First bank:</u>


1.07977643 - 1 = 0.07977 = 7.98%
<u>Second bank:</u>


1.076798729 - 1 = 0.076798729 = 7.68%
Notice tthis isthe effective rate not the annual percentage rate.
So only the statement abour the first bank effectibe rate is true.
Answer:
Explanation:
The following information can be gotten from the question:
Net realizable value (NRV) will be:
= $125,000 - $10,500
= $114,500
Normal profit will be:
= $114,500 - (30% × $125,000)
= $114,500 - $37,500
= $77,000
The amount should Garcel report as inventory on its balance sheet should be $77,000.
<span>When determining the value of raw land, there is a relatively fixed amount of supply; therefore, the value of land is primarily determined by demand?
Because land isn't something we can just add in to the world, there is a fixed amount of supply available to us as a resource. When the supply becomes scarce, it is easy for the value of land to go up because if demand is high and there is a low amount the price can be higher since there is less competition of the same. </span>