Answer:
Brayden should dispose of the gum
Explanation:
In the given scenario the law in Singapore states that having chewing gum is illegal. As far as Brayden is in Singapore he should comply with the law there.
The equal protection clause is a provision of law that states that all citizens must be treated equally under the law.
Although this gives one the right to take retain actions, in this case Brayden will be restricted from having chewing gum.
Of he is allowed to carry chewing gum then he expects to be treated differently from others in Singapore. This violates the equal protection clause
They would be asked to show ID’s
if there false police would be contacted
if no ID’s are provided they are to be escorted off the property
hope this helps
Answer: See explanation
Explanation: In appeals courts they review the procedures and the decisions in the trial court to make sure that the proceedings were fair and that the proper law was applied correctly. A panel of judges hear the cases in appeals courts.
Hope that helps!