The equation of the new path would be y=1/3x+4.
Explanation
If two lines are perpendicular, their slopes are negative reciprocals of each other. The original equation is written in slope-intercept form, y=mx+b, where m is the slope. In this equation, m=-3=-3/1.
In the new equation, the slope would be the opposite sign and flipped; this means it would be 1/3.
We can use the point given, the slope and slope-intercept form to write the equation of the new line:
y=mx+b
3=1/3(-3)+b
3=1/3(-3/1)+b
3=(-3/3)+b
3=-1+b
Add 1 to both sides:
3+1=-1+b+1
4=b
This makes the equation y=1/3x+4.
The greatest common factor would be 1.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
For obects already in motion, the distance travelled, s, is:
s = vi*t + (1/2)at^2
where vi is the initial velocity, a is the acceleration, and t is the time in seconds.
We want the time, t, to reach 1000 meters.
1000 m = (3 m/s)*t + (1/2)*(0.1m/s^2)*(t^2)
(1/2)*(0.1m/s^2)*(t^2) = 0.05t^2
0.05t^2 + 3t -1000 = 0
Solve quadratic equation:
t = 114.6 seconds
Answer:
- not linear
- somewhere between 184 and 186 (maybe)
Step-by-step explanation:
As you show, the weight differences are different for the same week differences, so the table is not linear. A graph (attached) can also show you the table is not linear.
__
The highest rate of weight loss shown in the table is 7 lbs in 3 weeks, or 4 2/3 pounds in 2 weeks. The lowest rate of weight loss shown in the table is 5 lbs in 3 weeks, or 3 1/3 pounds in 2 weeks. Based on the rates shown in the table, we might expect the starting weight to be between 3 1/3 and 4 2/3 pounds more than the first table value:
Week 0 weight: between 184 1/3 and 185 2/3 lbs, estimated.
_____
A "line of best fit" for the data has a y-intercept of about 185 pounds, which is the midpoint between our two estimates above.
Answer: 169.52
Step-by-step explanation
%increase which is 5% =100 x final - initial
---------------------
initial
the initial is $169.52
and the final $178
