Answer: Option (a) is correct.
Explanation:
Correct Option: The supply of loanable funds but not the supply of dollars in the market for foreign-currency exchange.
If the budget deficit increases, then U.S residents will want to purchase fewer foreign assets and foreign residents wants to buy more of U.S assets.
The budget deficit in the economy has to be financed either by borrowing or by increasing taxes. This budget deficit occurred because of the tax cuts and higher government spending.
If a country running a budget deficit, which lead to reduction in national saving. We all know that interest rate is determined in the loan market, where savers supply the loans to the private borrowers.
So, if there is a fall in the national saving, this will reduced the supply of loans from savers, which raises the interest rate in an economy.
This will attract the foreign flow of capital. This means that demand for domestic assets increases because of the higher interest rate.
Now, if foreign residents want to take an advantage of higher interest rate then they first have to acquire domestic currency.
Therefore, higher interest increases the demand for domestic currency in a market of foreign exchange.
<span>c. common resources are rival in consumption.
In the tragedy of the commons, William Forster Lloyd presented the example of a common resource being over used and destroyed because for any individual abusing the resource, they gained a benefit while the damage to the resource was paid by everyone.
So let's look at the available options and see what makes sense, or doesn't make sense.
a. people consider the value of resources in the future more than in the present.
* If this were true, the there wouldn't be a tragedy of the commons. So this is an incorrect answer.
b. markets do not account for the presence of property rights.
* The tragedy of the commons doesn't involve property rights. EVERYONE in the community is allowed to use the commons. The problem is irresponsible overuse of the common resource. So this is also an incorrect answer.
c. common resources are rival in consumption.
* This is the correct answer. The concept of Rivalry is where a common resource can not be simultaneous consumed by multiple users, or if the consumption of a resource decreases its utility to another consumer. In the tragedy, if one person grazes (consumes) more than their fair share, the commons gets over grazed and over time stops producing. Each person who's overgrazing does get a tangible short term benefit for doing so, but everyone has to pay the cost.
d. government does not efficiently allocate society's scarce resources.
* This is also a wrong answer. It's true that the commons could be regulated by the government, but then it would no longer be the commons.</span>
Answer: The value of the property is $156000.
Explanation: The value according to the cost approach is given by
(The estimated value of the land + The replacement cost of the house + additional improvements) - (Depreciation).
Therefore the calculation is:
<u>(33000 + 110000 + 20000) - (7000) = $ 156000.</u>
Answer:
I think it c sorry if you get I wrong
Although she hates the work, [ Jessica has spent most weekends and the last three summers as a shortorder cook; she has an associate's degree in paralegal studies; she loves to ride and spends every spare minute helping her uncle with his three horses. Now that she's planning to start a business, her best choice would probably be a Riding stable. ]
In short the answer is D. Riding stable
