The answer for this qeustion is: Thinking in time
By using scenarios, we can formulate several outcomes that could possibly happen if we decided to follow a certain plan.
If we do this, we could prepare our actions on how to deal with those outcomes before it actually happens in real life.
Answer:
hola aqui te va la respuesta y espero que te sirva
Explanation:
Son nefastas para nuestro planeta, produciendo mas de 215.000 toneladas de residuos en aparatos electrónicos
Answer: Hello below is the complete question
A survey of entrepreneurs focused on their job characteristics, work habits, social activities, leisure time, etc. One question put to each entrepreneur was, "What make of car (U.S., Europe, or Japan) do you drive?" The responses (number in each category) for a sample of 100 entrepreneurs are summarized below. The goal of the analysis is to determine if the proportions of entrepreneurs who drive American, European, and Japanese cars differ.
U.S. Europe Japan
40 35 25
In order to determine whether the true proportions in each response category differ, a one-way chi-square analysis should be conducted. Suppose the p-value for the test was calculated to be p=0.1738 . What is the appropriate conclusion to make when testing at α = 0.10?
Answer : The conclusion to be drawn is that We cannot reject the Null hypothesis if we use a one-way chi square analysis because at α = 0.1 from the chi-square tabulated p-value = 0.584 while the calculated /given p-value is = 0.1738
Explanation:
Data given:
p-value = 0.1738
α = 0.10
sample size = 100
U.S cars = 40, Europe cars = 35, Japan cars = 25
The conclusion to be drawn is that We cannot reject the Null hypothesis if we use a one-way chi square analysis because at α = 0.1 from the chi-square tabulated p-value = 0.584 while the calculated /given p-value is = 0.1738
The correct answer is D: May succeed when many voters are rationally ignorant.
Further Explanation:
Rent-seeking behavior can best be described a person lobbying for a particular business or person. Many times a politician is bribed to give a that business certain legislature rules/laws in favor for that company.
If logrolling is permissible, the rent seeking may be successful. Many times the this produces results that are not favorable to the public and can even be harmful. It really helps to understand the government policies when a person understands rent-seeking behavior.
Some ways a government may fail is;
- rent seeking behavior
- Regulatory capture
- rational ignorance
- logrolling
Learn more about rent-seeking behavior at brainly.com/question/13767756
#LearnwithBrainly
Answer: Because the issuer official no longer holds elected office, the contribution limits of Rule G-37 do not apply.
Explanation:
Rule G-37 is a way to ensure that Municipal Issuers are not unduly influenced by those who donated to their campaigns to get into a position to become Municipal Issuers.
It prohibites for 2 years, Municipal Finance Professionals (MFP) amongst others from engaging in municipal securities business with a Municipal issuer.
An exception however, is that if the MFP is entitled to a vote for the Official in question, they can donate no more than $250 per election.
Seeing as the Municipal Issuer Officer has lost her position, the MFP need not worry about this $250 limit as it no longer applies to her. The MFP is free to donate $500 to the "clean-up" campaign.
