Answer:
I’m saying the answer is C, which is the real-wage effect.
Answer: B
Explanation: That's the best one of the 4 options
Answer:
Net assets without a donor restriction in 20X1 will increase in $300,000
Explanation:
Given:
- Bookstore revenue: $300,000
- Spent for faculty research: $100,000
- The $100,000 for faculty research came from a $150,000 research grant received in the previous year
As we can see, $ 300,000 of bookstore sales have increased net assets that is not restricted by donors at $ 300,000. Spending $ 100,000 from a net asset to the limitations of the donor. Cost $ 100,000 (reduced) and $ 100,000 of "released" from restrictions of donors (increase) will appear in net assets without the limitations of donors.
So net assets without a donor restriction in 20X1 will increase in $300,000
Answer:
C: March 10
Explanation:
In this scenario he signed the security agreement on the 5th of March, picked up the car on the 10th of March, and filed the security agreement on the 15th of March.
Even though he signed the agreement on the 5th of March (which would be believed is the day that the security interest is attached), he only took it into his possession on the 10th. Only once you take the car into your possession does the security interest attach, since it is no longer in the possession of the car dealer.