No matter how much a company sells or does not sell, it has to pay fixed costs.

What was the result of developed countries extracting resources from their colonies?

saul85 [17]

Answer: D. There was a one-way flow of wealth favoring the colonizers.

Explanation:

With the Colonists simply taking resources and not paying the colonies for it, there was a one way flow of wealth which favored them alone. Had the colonists paid for the goods and then processed them for resale (as developed countries do now), there would have been at least some sort of wealth flowing back to the colonies for the resources they possessed. The Colonists were essentially not paying for raw material inputs for production and simply reaped all the benefits after processing.

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

SartainC orporation is planning its annual budget and has the following beginning and ending inventory levels planned for the ye

Tanzania [10]

Answer:

c.530,000 grams

Explanation:

Calculation for How much of the raw material should the company purchase during the year

First step is to prepare the Production Budget

PRODUCTION BUDGET

Budgeted unit sales 170,000

Add desired ending finished goods inventory

32,000

Total 202,000

(170,000+32,000)

Less beginning finished goods inventory (22,000)

Required production in units 180,000

(202,000-22,000)

Second step is to prepare Materials Budget

MATERIALS BUDGET

Raw materials required for production 540,000

(180,000*3 grams)

Add desired ending finished goods inventory

42,000

Total raw materials needed 582,000

(540,000+42,000)

Less beginning finished goods inventory (52,000)

Required material purchases 530,000 grams

(582,000-52,000)

Therefore the amount of the raw material that the company should purchase during the year is $530,000 grams

7 0

3 years ago

Roberto, the vice president of marketing, is talking to Francis, a sales manager in a foreign office, about several local situat

nadya68 [22]

Answer:

The correct answer is Geocentric.

Explanation:

According to administrative theory, Roberto presents a typical attitude of a geocentric manager, because he accepts the similarities and differences of national and foreign administrative policies, which allows him to find a balance with those practices that are most effective for the entity.

Otherwise it would be if he practiced an ethnocentric attitude, where he would discriminate the administrative practices of other countries, considering that those of his country of origin are superior, and that these can be exported at the same time as the goods and services of the organization.

Companies with interests abroad will probably have managers who have geocentric or ethnocentric perspectives. The geocentric attitude is the most convenient for managers of multinational companies, but it is also the most difficult to learn and accept.

6 0

3 years ago

An entrepreneur establishes a social justice online retail company. The company purchases authentic artwork, jewelry and crafts

Greeley [361]

Answer:

a. Developing a robust marketing program to promote the social justice elements of the business and gain insights into consumer purchasing behavior on the website

Explanation:

In order to sustain the business, the entrepreneur should create a robust marketing program in which he is able to promote the components of social justice and also the behavior of the consumer on the website so that he gets to know how much people are active in his website, what are the problem people are facing, etc

Hence, the correct option is a

3 0

2 years ago

7. How does AJ look tyrannical or monarchical with both the tariff/nullification crisis and Indian removal

lapo4ka [179]

Answer:

Andrew Jackson (AJ for short) was a statesman. He reached the height of this career when he became the 7th President of the United States (POTUS, having served as a soldier and a general in the United States Army). His administration spanned two terms of 4 years each (1829 to 1837)

In direct reference to the question, it can be said that due to his action, he was rather tyrannical than monarchial.

Explanation

On the overall, AJ is regarded by may historians favorably due to his many big wins. Some of those wins which he achieved as POTUS are:

The payment of a long standing national debt
the conclusion of the "most favored nation" treaty with the United Kingdom, which settled claims of damages against France from the Napoleonic Wars,
Prevention of the renewal of the charter of the Second Bank of the United States which was deemed as corrupt established created to enrich the wealthy at the expense of the plebian class and
the recognition Texas as a Republic. It may be worthy of note that he was the first POTUS to have survived an assassination attempt as a sitting president.

Irrespective of the above, his career was marred by two major dents:

The endorsement of the of the 1830 Indian Removal Act which forced many Native American tribes in the South to a space that became known as the Indian Territory. The forceful relocation was deemed necessary by the Blue Bloods (White Population) and resulted in mass suffering, mass death by many who where diseased during the forced relocation.
The Nullification Crises: For some reason, the congress approved a bill which by itself was designed to fail or be disapproved. It placed a huge tariff (as much as 45%, a historic high) on the Southern Cotton Farmers. The bill became known as the "Tariff of Abominations". He later conceded to several downward revisions of the tariff, first to 27% and further downwards later but not after it had caused a lot of rift between the state of South Carolina and the Federal Government where in the South Carolina had declared the bill unconstitutional. This call out against the Federal Government became known as the Nullification Crises.

Cheers

6 0

2 years ago