Answer:
B. The width of the confidence interval would be smaller.
Step-by-step explanation:
By reducing the confidence level from 99% to 95%, the student assumes that there is more uncertainty about the new confidence interval than the previous one. That, being said, since the results aren't as certain, the confidence interval is widened towards a central average point because the new interval isn't as accurate.
Therefore, the answer is B. The width of the confidence interval would be smaller.
Rise over run = y2 - y1 / x2 - x1
3-12/-8 - (-17)
-9/ 9 which simplifies to —> -1 = slope
If this exact question is repeatedly deleted, it's probably because of the ambiguity of the given equation. I see two likely interpretations, for instance:
or
If the first one is what you intended, then
and it follows that
2<em>k</em> + 8 = 3 ==> 2<em>k</em> = -5 ==> <em>k</em> = -5/2
If you meant the second one, then
which would give
<em>k</em> + 9 = 3 ==> <em>k</em> = -6
And for all I know, you might have meant some other alternative... When you can, you should include a picture of your problem.
Answer:
See below.
Step-by-step explanation:
The domain which is all the posible values of x is: x is real and in the interval
[1, 6].
The range is real f(x) in the interval [1, 7].
Answer:
1562.5
Step-by-step explanation:
WE just do cross multiplication for this.
==>(250000*5)/800=1562.5
