Answer:
- Common laws
- Precedent
Explanation:
'Blackstone's Commentaries on the Law of England' is popularly known for elaborating the '<u>common law</u>.' It is characterized as the 'law about the law' which implies that the text penned by Sir William Blackstone functioned to establish the extensive principles of truth, integrity, and justice.
'<u>Precedent</u>' is characterized as the prior decision or judgment of the court that is used as a citation, analogy, or example to resolve a similar dispute in the future. Thus, it allows in developing better assimilation of the law and take future decisions(in similar cases) by using precedents as the reference.
The state legislature could have refused to implement the decision, leading to a crisis in the legitimacy of the Supreme Court's authority.
Baker v. Carr (1962) is the U.S. Preferred court docket case that held that federal courts should hear cases alleging that a state's drawing of electoral obstacles, i.E. Redistricting, violates the identical safety Clause of the Fourteenth modification of the charter.
Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962), became a landmark USA ideal court docket case in which the court held that redistricting qualifies as a justiciable question beneath the Fourteenth Amendment, therefore enabling federal courts to hear Fourteenth amendment-based totally redistricting instances.
Learn more about legislature here brainly.com/question/809346
#SPJ4
Answer:
Contains full text of the U.S. Constitution, historical notes, and annotations of cases decided by the U.S. Supreme Court. Prepared by Library of Congress, Congressional Research Services.
Answer:
For wealthy Romans, life was good. They lived in beautiful houses – often on the hills outside Rome, away from the noise and the smell. They enjoyed an extravagant lifestyle with luxurious furnishings, surrounded by servants and slaves to cater to their every desire. Many would hold exclusive dinner parties and serve their guests the exotic dishes of the day.
and for the poor
,
Poorer Romans, however, could only dream of such a life. Sweating it out in the city, they lived in shabby, squalid houses that could collapse or burn at any moment. If times were hard, they might abandon newborn babies to the streets, hoping that someone else would take them in as a servant or slave. Poor in wealth but strong in numbers, they were the Roman mob, who relaxed in front of the popular entertainment of the time – chariot races between opposing teams, or gladiators fighting for their life, fame and fortune.
Although their lives may have been different, they did have some things in common. In any Roman family life, the head of the household was a man. Although his wife looked after the household, he controlled it. He alone could own property. Only he decided the fate of his children and who they would marry.
Explanation:
