virus link above me
dont download it pls u might get virus
Answer:
the axis labels are inconsistent with the graph title
Step-by-step explanation:
The independent variable is described as "% protein digested", and the dependent variable is described as "time." The graphed values suggest that these are reasonable descriptors for the data being plotted.
The title, however, says the data points are "percentage digestion per hour". This is in disagreement with the axis labels, and is inconsistent with the shape of the curve. (If the title is to be believed, the digestion rate is such that more than 100% of <whatever> has been digested after 10 hours.)
__
<em>Additional comment</em>
Another error is the vertical axis is graduated as though it were linear, but it is decidedly non-linear. Equivalent distances on the graph are shown for differences of 10%, 5%, 10% and 25%. That is the scale varies by a factor of 5 from one part of the graph to another.
Answer: 4
Step-by-step explanation:
There are 4 terms, 
Answer:
1800
Step-by-step explanation:
The sum to n terms of an arithmetic sequence is
=
[ 2a₁ + (n - 1)d ]
where a₁ is the first term and d the common difference
Here a₁ = - 27 and d = 6, thus
=
[ (2 × - 27) + (29 × 6) ]
= 15( - 54 + 174)
= 15(120)
= 1800
Answer:
We would have

where " l " is length, " w" is width and "h" is height.
Step-by-step explanation:
Step 1
Remember that
Surface area for a box with no top = 
where " l " is length, " w" is width and "h" is height.
Step 2.
Remember as well that
Volume of the box = 
Step 3
We can now use lagrange multipliers. Lets say,

and

By the lagrange multipliers method we know that

Step 4
Remember that

and

So basically you will have the system of equations

Now, remember that you can multiply the first eqation, by "l" the second equation by "w" and the third one by "h" and you would get

Then you would get

You can get rid of
from these equations and you would get

And from those equations you would get

Now remember the original equation

If we plug in what we just got, we would have
