Is the point (3, 11) a solution for the linear equation 1/3x + y = 12? Explain.

In a study of red/green color blindness, 700 men and 2850 women are randomly selected and tested. Among the men, 66 have red/gre

olga55 [171]

Answer:

$z=\frac{0.0943-0.00281}{\sqrt{0.0208(1-0.0208)(\frac{1}{700}+\frac{1}{2850})}}=15.197$

$p_v =P(Z>15.197) \approx 0$

If we compare the p value and using any significance level for example $\alpha=0.05$ always $p_v$ so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis, and we can say the the proportion of men with red/green color blindness.is significanlty higher than the proportion of women with red/green color blindness.

Step-by-step explanation:

Data given and notation

$X_{M}=66$ represent the number of men with red/green color blindness.

$X_{W}=8$ represent the number of women with red/green color blindness.

$n_{M}=700$ sample of male slected

$n_{W}=2850$ sample of female selected

$p_{M}=\frac{66}{700}=0.0943$ represent the proportion of male with red/green color blindness.

$p_{W}=\frac{8}{2850}=0.00281$ represent the proportion of female with red/green color blindness.

z would represent the statistic (variable of interest)

$p_v$ represent the value for the test (variable of interest)

Concepts and formulas to use

We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to check if the proportion of men with red/green color blindness. is higher than the proportionof women with red/green color blindness. , the system of hypothesis would be:

Null hypothesis: $p_{M} \leq p_{W}$

Alternative hypothesis: $p_{M} > p_{W}$

We need to apply a z test to compare proportions, and the statistic is given by:

$z=\frac{p_{M}-p_{W}}{\sqrt{\hat p (1-\hat p)(\frac{1}{n_{M}}+\frac{1}{n_{W}})}}$ (1)

Where $\hat p=\frac{X_{M}+X_{W}}{n_{M}+n_{W}}=\frac{66+8}{700+2850}=0.0208$

Calculate the statistic

Replacing in formula (1) the values obtained we got this:

$z=\frac{0.0943-0.00281}{\sqrt{0.0208(1-0.0208)(\frac{1}{700}+\frac{1}{2850})}}=15.197$

Statistical decision

For this case we don't have a significance level provided $\alpha$ , but we can calculate the p value for this test.

Since is a one side test the p value would be:

$p_v =P(Z>15.197) \approx 0$

If we compare the p value and using any significance level for example $\alpha=0.05$ always $p_v$ so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis, and we can say the the proportion of men with red/green color blindness.is significanlty higher than the proportion of women with red/green color blindness.

8 0

3 years ago

Samira used the calculator to find 254.3 × 2.5. Which statement best describes her work? Samira is correct. Samira is incorrect.

alekssr [168]

Answer:

A samira is correct

Step-by-step explanation:

Because she did her own expression right, now she has to solve

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

The height of a triangle is 5 inches less than twice the base of the triangle. Which equation ents this relationship if x repres

Vika [28.1K]

Let height = h
Let base = x

h = 2x - 5

4 0

2 years ago

Please answer correctly !!!!!!!!! Will mark brianliest !!!!!!!!!!!!!

Snowcat [4.5K]

Answer:

$12,000,000

Step-by-step explanation:

The maximum will be the vertex and because this is written in vertex form the vertex will be (5, 12) so the maximum income will be 12 million dollars.

7 0

3 years ago

Use the given information to write the equation of the parabola.

m_a_m_a [10]

Answer:

x² = -2y

Step-by-step explanation:

The focus is p away from the vertex, and so is the directrix.

To find the equation of the parabola, we must first determine if the parabola is horizontal or vertical.

Horizontal parabola [Standard form]: (y – k)² = 4p(x – h)
Vertical parabola [Standard form]: (x – h)² = 4p(y – k)

If the parabola is vertical, the directrix, and focus will have the same x value but different y value compared to the vertex (h, k). You can also tell if the directrix in in the form y = k – p, and if the focus is in the form (h, k + p).

Likewise, if the parabola is horizontal, the directrix, and focus will have the same y value but different x value compared to the vertex (h,k) . You can also tell if the directrix is in the form x = h – p, and if the focus is in the form (h + p, k).

For this problem, given that the vertex is at the origin (0,0), and that the focus is at the point (0, -½).

You can tell that the x value is the same for the vertex, and focus so this must be a vertical parabola. Because this is a vertical parabola, we can use the form mentioned as earlier (x – h)² = 4p(y – k).

If h = 0, and k = 0, the p value must be the difference between the k of the vertex, and the k of the focus: -½ - 0 → -½.

Now we can just plug in our known information to derive the equation!

h = 0, k = 0, p = -½ → (x - h)² = 4p(y - k) →

(x - 0)² = 4(-½)(y - 0) → x² = -2(y - 0) →

x² = -2y.

Also p = 1/4a, if you are wondering.

So because this is a vertical parabola, x² = -2y is generally the same as y = -1/2x² in standard quadratic form. I just like to think of the horizontal parabola as an inverse quadratic because it is like reflecting over the line y = x.

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers