This example shows that <u>economic boom periods can overheat and lead to speculative bubbles.</u>
<u></u>
<h3><u>A Speculative Bubble: What Is It?</u></h3>
A speculative bubble is characterized by a rapid, dramatic price increase that is driven more by market momentum and mood than by underlying fundamentals.
Fundamentals like significant profit growth or hopes of future market dominance at first fuel the speculation, but these fundamentals are eventually overtaken by other factors that don't reflect the real value of the company or industry.
Prices rise when investors rush to buy, thinking that prices will rise further and that if they don't buy, an opportunity will pass them by.
Fundamentals eventually overtake momentum, the bubble bursts, the stock tanks, and prices fall back to their pre-bubble levels.
Learn more about speculative bubble with the help of the given link:
brainly.com/question/16810603?referrer=searchResults
#SPJ4
The media richness most directly denotes to the number of helpful cues and abrupt feedback a medium provides or the data carrying capacity of a communication medium. In addition, the early computer-mediated communication theory named the media richness theory absorbed on categorizing each medium conferring to the difficulty of the messages it handles proficiently.
Answer:
The criticism is true to a certain degree, and unjustified to another degree.
Explanation:
It is true in the sense that the U.S. has indeed lost a lot of manufacturing to Mexico, simply because Mexico has far lower labor costs, and U.S. manufacturers have decided to take advantage of that by taking their plants to Mexican states.
It is also true that Mexico has been running a trade surplus with the United States in recent years, mainly because of the large manufacturing sector that Mexico has been developing.
On the other hand, the criticism is unjustified because neither a trade deficit nor the moving of manufacturing to Mexico mean that the United States as a whole is in worst condition than before NAFTA. In fact, most economists agree that free trade is a good thing for the economy as a whole, and that most people benefit from the lower costs and specialization that trade brings about.
The problem lies then, in the people who lose their jobs: formerly unionized manufacturing workers from the Rust Belt, for example. These people need to be helped with government assitance, both in terms of welfare, and training, so that they can find new jobs and make ends meet in the meanwhile.
Answer:
Total indirect manufacturing cost= $75,450
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
12,000 units:
Variable manufacturing overhead $ 1.50
Fixed manufacturing overhead $ 5.00
<u>First, we need to calculate the total fixed manufacturing overhead:</u>
Total fixed overhead= 5*12,000= $60,000
<u>Now, for 10,300 units:</u>
Total indirect manufacturing cost= 60,000 + 10,300*1.5
Total indirect manufacturing cost= $75,450
Answer:
None of the fixed costs are avoidable. Therefore the company now loses all the fixed costs and the positive contribution margin.
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Wood Aluminum Hard Rubber
Total Sales $65000
Variable expenses (58000)
Contribution margin 7000
Fixed expenses (22000)
Net income (loss) (15000)
Effect on income= -22,000 - 7,000= -29,000
None of the fixed costs are avoidable. Therefore the company now loses all the fixed costs and the positive contribution margin.
