Answer:
A. A claim by the employee will probably be based on promissory estoppel
Explanation:
Promissory estoppel doctrine refers to trying to enforce a promise. In other words, a person that makes a promise is responsible for performing it as long as:
- the promissor made a promise and the promisee acted because of it
- the promisee relied on the promise
- the promisee suffers a loss due to the unfulfilled promise
Natural monopoly tends to serve a whole market exclusively.
<h2>What is Natural Monopoly?</h2>
A natural monopoly is a sort of monopoly that frequently arises as a result of the high start-up costs or considerable economies of scale of operating a business in a particular industry, which can result in significant barriers to entry for potential competitors. In a certain sector or region, a corporation with a natural monopoly might be the exclusive supplier of a given good or service. In industries that need specialized technology, raw materials, or other elements to function, natural monopolies may develop.
<h3>Key Features of Natural Monopoly</h3>
- A natural monopoly is a special kind of monopoly that develops when there is only one company that can effectively provide the service in a particular area due to high start-up costs and considerable economies of scale.
- A business with a natural monopoly may be the exclusive supplier of a good or service in a given sector or region.
- Natural monopolies are permitted when one firm can provide a good or service for less money than any potential rival, but they are frequently very tightly controlled to safeguard consumers.
Learn more about Natural monopoly here:
brainly.com/question/2182872
#SPJ4
Answer: Option C
Explanation: The given question relates to the concept of time value of money which in simple words states that the value of money decreases over time. The value of a dollar today will be less than tomorrow.
Hence if a card holder gets grace period to pay the interest before the interest accrues than it means he actually gets to pay lower interest that he could have paid before.
Hence from the above we can conclude that the correct option is C.
Answer:
A: $127.2
B: $123.384, $3.816 per share and $3,816 per contract
C: 9.43%
Explanation:
A: Futures price
F° = S° (1 + rₙ) = $120 x 1.06
= $127.20
B: Change in Future Price and Investor Margin account:
New Spot = $120 (1 – 0.03)
= $120 x 0.97
= $116.40
New Futures = $116.40 (1.06)
= $123.384
The long investor loses = $127.20 - $123.384
= $3.816 per share
or $3.816 (1,000) = $3,816 per contract
C: Percentage return on the investor’s position:
Percentage return = $12,000 / $127,200
= 9.43%
Answer:
option (A) $86
Explanation:
Data provided in the question:
Coupon rate = 6%
Face value of bonds = $1,000
Purchasing price (i.e the selling percentage at the time of purchase )
= 98.6% of par
Selling price = 101.2% of par
Thus,
Annual Coupon payment = Face value × Coupon rate
= $1,000 × 6%
= $60
Now,
Purchase price = $1,000 × 98.60%
= $986
Sales price = Face value of bonds × Selling price
= $1,000 × 101.20%
= $1,012
Therefore,
Total dollar Return
= Sales price + Annual Coupon payment - Purchase price
= $1,012 + $60 - $986
= $86
Hence,
The correct answer is option (A) $86
