She profits more each month
Answer:
Georgeland has an absolute but not a comparative advantage in producing clothing.
Explanation:
Absolute advantage is defined as the ability of a firm to produce higher amounts of a product as a result of use of the same resources with other competitors. It is usually bad a result of more efficient production process.
Comparative advantage is the ability of a firm to produce goods at a lower opportunity cost. Therefore they are able to sell at lower price compared to competitors.
Georgeland can produce 18 units of clothe per year while Alland can produce 16 units per year, so Georgeland has absolute advantage.
In producing clothes Georgeland has opportunity cost of 36 units of food which is higher than that of Alland which is 32 units of food. So Georgeland does not have comparative advantage in producing clothes.
Answer:
B) awareness training
Explanation:
In this scenario, based on all that Floyd is doing seems as though he is using awareness training on his employees. This is a training technique used to train employees on cultural and ethnic diversity as well as what is appropriate and inappropriate when dealing with different cultures. Like mentioned in the question this also encourages employees to think outside the box and question stereotypes.
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "D": product of an extra worker is less than the previous worker's marginal product.
Explanation:
The Law of Diminishing Marginal Productivity indicates that increasing one variable while holding others the same can initially increase output but eventually adding more of that variable results in lower return rates. This law helps explain that it is not always the best way to increase income by increasing production.
<em>Initially, companies recruiting additional workers would boost production until too few machines or not enough space is sufficient to accommodate everyone. Then, the production rate will decrease.</em>
Answer:
$319,000
Explanation:
The computation of the liability is shown below:
= Total expenses in three year - actual warranty expenditure
where,
Total expenses in three years = Total sales × total percentage of sales
= $6,200,000 × 9%
= $558,000
And, the actual warranty expenditure is $239,000
Now put these values to the above formula
So, the value would equal to
= $558,000 - $239,000
= $319,000
