Answer:
2 + .05x = 1.5 +.1x
.5 = .05x
x =10 is number when costs are equal
So the 11th check makes Bank A cheaper
Step-by-step explanation:
Step-by-step explanation:
Nø of sample space, n(s) = 40
nø of unripe oranges, n (u) = 12
no of ripe oranges, n (r) = 40 - 12 = 28
Now
The probability that it is ripe is, P(E)
= n(r) / n(s)
= 28 / 40
= 7 / 10
Also the probability that it is unripe is, P(E)
= n(u) / n(s)
= 12 / 40
= 3 / 10
Hope it will help :)❤
The answer to the question is 21/3
Answer:
breadth = 8, length = 32
Step-by-step explanation:
perimeter = 2 x (length x breadth)
= 2 x ((24 + b) + b))
= 2 x (24 + 2b)
= 48 + 4 b
48 + 4b meters costs rupees 2400
each meter costs rupees 30
so,
30 x (48 + 4b) = 2400
1440 + 120b = 2400
120b = 960
b = 8
the breadth is 8m, the length is 8 + 24 = 32m
9514 1404 393
Answer:
a) see the attached spreadsheet (table)
b) Calculate, for a 10-year horizon; Computate for a longer horizon.
c) Year 13; no
Step-by-step explanation:
a) The attached table shows net income projections for the two companies. Calculate's increases by 0.5 million each year; Computate's increases by 15% each year. The result is rounded to the nearest dollar.
__
b) After year 4, Computate's net income is increasing by more than 0.5 million per year, so its growth is faster and getting faster yet. However, in the first 10 years, Calculate's net income remains higher than that of Computate. If we presume that some percentage of net income is returned to investors, then Calculate may provide a better return on investment.
The scenario given here is only interested in the first 10 years. However, beyond that time frame (see part C), we find that Computate's income growth far exceeds that of Calculate.
__
c) Extending the table through year 13, we see that Computate's net income exceeds Calculate's in that year. It continues to remain higher as long as the model remains valid.