Answer:
Example of not a natural experiment an economist might use to evaluate a theory is:
C. Here the Students in a microeconomics principles course are advised to play a game with their classmates to determine and evaluate what all decisions they make under certain adjusted circumstances.
Explanation:
Natural experiment : A natural experiment is referred to an observational and also an empirical study in which we get to study about the experimental and controllable varieties of variables. which can not het manipulated anywhere by the researchers.
Instead these experiments are allowed to affect the environment and the nature or the different factors which are not under control of our researchers. In contrast to the experimental values and all the natural experiments are even not controlled by the researchers but instead they also admire and obseve those experiments for their own studies.
So, the right option is:
C. Here the Students in a microeconomics principles course are advised to play a game with their classmates to determine and evaluate what all decisions they make under certain adjusted circumstances.
Answer:
- <u><em>D. It has both good and bad effects, but we can't always predict what those are.</em></u>
<u><em></em></u>
Explanation:
Of course, ethics mandates that the target of science and <em>new technology </em>should always pursue the good for humans; nevertheless, since time immemorial man has developed technology to make war. Thus, definetely, the first statement <em>"A It always does good for human"</em> is false.
Some other negative effects of <em>new technology</em>, like cars and nuclear power, have been harmful to the environment, but you cannot tell that this has always been so. Technology has also been developed to help the environment. For instance, panels to use solar energy do not harm the environment and seek to reduce fuel burning to help the environment. Thus, option <em>B, "It always ends up doing harm to the environment"</em> is false too.
Some of the damage that new technology can produce are not predicted both because the technology is new and because it may be used with different goals to those it was developed. This explains why option <em>C, It has many bad effects</em>, is false, and option <em>D, "It has both good and bad effects, but we can't always predict what those are", </em>is true.
Answer:
$11,000 cost, five-year life, and $1,000 salvage value
Explanation:
given data
cost = $11,000
residual value = $1,000
estimated to be good = 5,000 hour
solution
as per the straight-line method
formula to compute the depreciation expense that is express as
depreciation expense = (Purchase value of generator - residual value) ÷ (estimated useful life) .......................1
and
here by considering here these three item
and other information that is not relevant that ignore
depreciation expense = ($11,000 - $1,000) ÷ 5 years = 2000
so $11,000 cost, five-year life, and $1,000 salvage value
Answer:
Correct option is E.
Explanation:
There is not enough information to calculate the amount.
Net operating asset= Operating Assets - Operating Liabilities
=$5489 Million - $2066 Million
=$3423 Million
Hence Average net operating assets can't be calculated by given information.
Answer:
Explanation:
There are two things that Aaron can do to make sure of this. The first is to make the office wheelchair-friendly. Meaning installing ramps in the necessary places so that the candidate can easily traverse the office and get to and from the places she needs easily and by herself. The second thing that Aaron can do is make sure that the candidate's abilities are better than the other candidates. These skills will make her an asset because she will be able to bring insight and experience that the other candidates would never be able to.
