Answer:
C. This is not plagiarism
Explanation:
This is not a plagiarism at all because the author of student version did but the suspected text in quote and cite the sentence properly at the end of the statement as "(Gredler, 2001)". Therefore, this cannot be an A. Word-for-Word plagiarism nor a B. Paraphrasing plagiarism
<u>In some </u><u>Native American</u><u> communities, people accused of breaking the law meet with community members, victims (if any), village elders, and agents of the justice system in a sentencing circle</u>. A sentencing circle involves discussion between offenders, victims, and members of the community. A person sitting in the circle has no special powers/privileges. The circle operates on the basis of consensus. Each member of the circle expresses his/her feelings about the act that was committed and raises questions/concerns. The accused can express regret about his/her actions and a desire to change the harmful behavior. This question is related to Criminology.
I believe the answer that you are looking for is interest.
This effect is called proactive interference.
Proactive interference (PI) is a type of explanation for why we forget or cannot recall information. The PI effect means that forgetting occurs because old memories interfere with our ability to form memories. An example of the PI effect is when you try to learn or memorize a new phone number, however, phone numbers that already exist in your memory interfere with your learning of the new phone number.
