The advantage of a federal government would be It Allows local states to be independent and has an autonomy toward their territories, while providing opportunities for the central government to intervene.
The disadvantage would be there would be less uniformity between people on different states in response to the issues that the country face.
La respuesta correcta para esta pregunta abierta es la siguiente.
A pesar de que que no hay opciones ni incisos para responder, podemos comentar lo siguiente.
La diferencia entre la opinión de una problemática social y el estudio de dicha problemática es que la opinión simplemente se basa en eso, en simples opiniones o criterios propios de los ciudadanos o participantes en la opinión pública. Esa opinión no tiene mayor bases que los respalden porque son simples percepciones.
En cambio, el estudio de una problemática no se basa en opiniones, sino en investigaciones, Esta problemática debe ser analizada desde la perspectiva política, económica, social o científica, dependiendo de la problemática, para poder analizarla, entender el fenómeno que se presenta y dar una explicación sensata con argumentos.
<em>Your answer is FR. </em>
<em></em>
<em>"Fixed Ratio"</em>
<em></em>
<em>I hope this helps. </em>
The correct answer would be, Direct Influence.
When Erin and Brooke willingly comply, their parents are likely to be warm and gentle in the future. This is an example of a Direct Influence between parents and their children.
Explanation:
When children comply, it means they are acting in accordance with a wish or command of someone. So when children comply with their parents, it means they are acting according to their parents' wish and command.
When children act according to their parents wish and command, the parents are likely to be given a warm and gentle treatment to their children in the future. This is the example of direct influence, which tells us that parents commanded their children, to which the children comply, and then parents treat them gently and warmly. This is the direct influence between both parties.
Learn more about direct influence at:
brainly.com/question/1879333
#LearnWithBrainly
The statement which states that there is strong empirical support indicating that learning two languages <em>interferes </em>with effective cognitive development and this statement is false.
As a result of this, we can see that cognitive development has to do with the way the brain develops with regards to what it can assimilate things and we can see that there is NO evidence which supports that learning two languages would limit this development.
Therefore, the correct answer is false.
Read more about cognitive development here:
brainly.com/question/8627797
