Answer:
Why has this work been written?
Who is the audience and what is the message?
Is it sponsored? Has a group or company paid the author to make these claims? Consider, for instance, lobby groups, special interest groups, corporate entities etc.
Is it biased? Is the author affected by political, social, economic, environmental, religious, cultural, personal or any other bias?
Explanation:
Answer:
C. The results of a model event may not be similar enough to the results of the actual event.
Explanation:
The problem with models is that sometimes we trust them too much! Sometimes they are not accurate for long-term actual events. This is answer choice C.
- Models are never more accurate than reality, so rule out A.
- The model is based on our predictions of the actual event, so rule out B.
- The model being "too similar" to the actual event is what we want! So rule out D.
Answer:
If this is actually a question, a suit of armor would be a good analogy for the function of the skeletal system because they both protect you.
Explanation:
Matthias Schleiden and zoologist Theodor Schwann determined that all living things were composed of cells
The question to the above information is;
What is the best use of an atomic model to explain the charge of the particles in Thomson's beams?
Answer;
An atom's smaller negative particles are at a distance from the central positive particles, so the negative particles are easier to remove.
Explanation;
-Atoms are comprised of a nucleus consisting of protons (red) and neutrons (blue). The number of orbiting electrons is the same as the number of protons and is termed the "atomic number" of the element.
J.J. Thomson discovered the electron. Atoms are neutral overall, therefore in Thomson’s ‘plum pudding model’:
- atoms are spheres of positive charge
- electrons are dotted around inside
