1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Yuki888 [10]
3 years ago
14

Can someone​ give methe ​ correct answer with work please, need help. I will give brainlist!!!!

Mathematics
1 answer:
lana [24]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Option B is the correct answer

Step-by-step explanation:

Option B is the correct answer

\Sigma_{k=0}^\infty\frac{3}{k(k+2)}

You might be interested in
X f(x) = −x2 + x + 6
masha68 [24]

Answer:

a=0 b=6 c=4 on edge exercise

Step-by-step explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Can u please solve this problem
mash [69]

I think it would be 11.7 degrees warmer.

Hope this helped ;}

7 0
3 years ago
The following week , tamiko earns a check for 109.60 for working at a fast food restaurant and a small bonus check for 34.15 det
AlexFokin [52]

Answer:

Tamiko will save 86.25

Step-by-step explanation:

Tamiko's earning from fast food restaurant check = 109.60

Tamiko's earning from small bonus check = 34.15

net amount earned by Tamiko = Tamiko's earning from fast food restaurant check + Tamiko's earning from small bonus check

net amount earned by Tamiko = 143.75

As she wants to save \frac{3}{5} of the net amount.

the amount saved = (\frac{3}{5} ) 143.75

                               = 86.25

4 0
3 years ago
In need of assist, been on this question for a while now and don't know what to do, if someone can tell me the answer, I will ap
andrey2020 [161]
I'm not sure but my best guess would be C. $6244.86
6 0
3 years ago
Find the negation of the proposition
murzikaleks [220]

In accordance with <em>propositional</em> logic, <em>quantifier</em> theory and definitions of <em>simple</em> and <em>composite</em> propositions, the negation of a implication has the following equivalence:

\neg (\exists \,x\, (P(x) \implies  Q(x))) \iff \forall \,x (\neg \,Q(x) \,\land \,P(x)) (Correct choice: iii)

<h3>How to find the equivalent form of a proposition</h3>

Herein we have a <em>composite</em> proposition, that is, the union of <em>monary</em> and <em>binary</em> operators and <em>simple</em> propositions. According to <em>propositional</em> logic and <em>quantifier</em> theory, the negation of an implication is equivalent to:

\neg (\exists \,x\, (P(x) \implies  Q(x))) \iff \forall \,x (\neg \,Q(x) \,\land \,P(x))

To learn more on propositions: brainly.com/question/14789062

#SPJ1

8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Question 28: Please help, which pairs of angles could she have used?
    13·1 answer
  • -3/4x+5/6y=15<br>x-intercept=<br>y-intercept=
    14·1 answer
  • 20 divided from 2 plus five plus five
    6·1 answer
  • Find the 10th term of the following geometric sequence.<br> 2, 10, 50, 250, ...
    10·1 answer
  • Which expression is equivalent to the following complex fraction? mc024-1.jpg
    15·2 answers
  • *****Write a polynomial using the roots -3,5i. PLEASE HELP IM SO LOST!!!
    9·1 answer
  • 0.5 as a fraction in lowest term
    13·2 answers
  • What is the scale factor from ALMN to AOPQ?
    7·1 answer
  • Mr. Anderson has a credit card balance of - $80.23 at the end of the month. Use Mr. Anderson's credit card balance to describe a
    11·1 answer
  • ANSWERS FOR THESE!!!
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!