2.375 pounds. Just take 79.25 and subtract 76.875 and you get your results.
Answer:
True
Step-by-step explanation:
Hi, the statement is true, because to divide a fraction we have to turn the second fraction upside down and multiply them. Since a whole number x can be written as x/1, it also applies to the case of dividing a fraction by a whole number.
We can prove it with an example.
Dividing a unit fraction by a whole number
1/2 ÷ 2 = (1x1) / (2x2) = 1/4
Multiplying the unit fractions by a unit fraction with a whole number as a denominator
1/2 x 1/2= (1x1) / (2x2) = 1/4
Answer:
with what
Step-by-step explanation:
what do you need help with if there was photo we can't see it
Answer:
8
Step-by-step explanation:
The fact that DE is perpendicular to AC means triangles AED and CED are congruent and side AD is equal in length to side CD.
5x -20 = 2x +4
3x = 24 . . . . . . . add 20-2x
x = 8 . . . . . . . . . .divide by 3
The value of x is 8.
Answer:
2.5 miles
Step-by-step explanation:
The relation between time, speed, and distance is ...
distance = speed × time
We can define t to be Stanley's swimming time. Then t+0.5 was his running time, and 2(t+0.5) was his biking time. His total distance covered is ...
64 = 9(t +0.5) +16(2(t +0.5)) +2.5(t)
64 = 43.5t +20.5 . . . . . . . simplify
43.5 = 43.5t . . . . . . . . . subtract 20.5
t = 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . divide by the coefficient of t
Stanley swam for 1 hour, so the distance he covered while swimming was ...
(2.5 mi/h)(1 h) = 2.5 mi
Stanley covered 2.5 miles while swimming.
_____
<em>Additional comment</em>
Stanley ran for 1.5 hours, covering 9×1.5 = 13.5 miles. He biked for 3 hours, covering 16×3 = 48 miles. His total distance was 2.5 +13.5 +48 = 64 miles, as given.
