Answer:
yes
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
2 5 8
Step-by-step explanation:
2+5+8=15
im not sure if that's what its asking for. if it isn't im sorry
First you input the equation into the quadratic formula:
__________
x=<span><span><span>−<span>(<span>−2</span>)</span></span>±<span>√<span><span><span>(<span>−2</span>)</span>2</span>−<span><span>4<span>(1)</span></span><span>(5)</span></span></span></span></span>
</span> -----------------------------
2(1)
Next you simplify the formula:
___
x=<span><span>2±<span>√<span>−16
</span></span></span></span> ------------
2
This problem has no real solutions.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Using the distance formula,
So the perimeter is 
He made a mistake in step #2. It seemed to be a trivial mistake because it involved signs, but it still had a great impact. Since step#2, his solution was already wrong.
Instead of
(-1)²-4(2)(-6) = 1 + 48 = 49
What he did is
(-1)²-4(2)(-6) = -1 + 48 = 47
