1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Artyom0805 [142]
3 years ago
6

The Sagebrush Rebellion took place against the policies of the federal government during the Carter administration. What evidenc

e was apparent in the presidential election of 1976 that indicated the rebellion had already started against Carter before he was inaugurated
History
1 answer:
nasty-shy [4]3 years ago
5 0

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Although there are no options attached we can say the following.

The Sagebrush Rebellion took place against the policies of the federal government during the Carter administration. What evidence was apparent in the presidential election of 1976 that indicated the rebellion had already started against Carter before he was inaugurated?

Answer:

Jimmy Carter won the states west of the Missouri River, except Hawaii and Texas, despite all the arguments presented by his rival Geral Ford, during the Presidential election of 1976.

At the beginning of the 1970s, the Sagebrush Rebellion started as a movement that demanded changes to the US federal government in that western people wanted to have more control in the use of the land.

American people who lived in thirteen states of the west demanded more state and local control of the lands, including total control over those territories. They thought privatization was the best solution for their demands. A big portion of these lands was located in the sagebrush steppe.

So we could say President Jimmy Carter inherited the conflict from past administrations that could not resolve the issue.

You might be interested in
Why did terroist use airplanes instead of bombs on 9/11 (respond fast)
Len [333]

Answer:

t’s well known that the terrorists methodically planned their attacks on America.  From the first plane that hit the south tower of the World Trade Center and the second only ten minutes later that hit the north tower, to the plane that hit the Pentagon and the one that crashed into a Pennsylvania field, every action of terrorism was calculated in advance and executed according to plan.

If my answer doesn't help you, just tell me, and i'll try to help you! :)

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
explain the Columbian exchange. what were its effects on North America and its inhabitants? How did Europeans alter the way of l
tresset_1 [31]

Answer:

The impact was most severe in the Caribbean, where by 1600 Native American populations on most islands had plummeted by more than 99 percent. Across the Americas, populations fell by 50 percent to 95 percent by 1650. The disease component of the Columbian Exchange was decidedly one-sided.

8 0
3 years ago
The Taft-Hartley Act intended to do which of the following?. .A. curb the laws that gave too much power to union leaders. B. gra
Gnesinka [82]
<span>The answer is letter A. Curb the laws that gave too much power to union leaders.</span>
<span>
This law was also known as the Labor Management Relations Act. This law was created after several strikes conducted by many employees that had nearly disabled many factories in the US. This law allowed employees and employers to create laws that would benefit both sides.</span>
4 0
3 years ago
Based on what you have learned in this lesson, write two to three sentences describing one success and one failure of Clinton’s
cupoosta [38]

When the Genocide Convention was passed by the United Nations in 1948, the world said, “Never again.”

But the history of the twentieth century instead proved that “never again” became “again and again.”  The promise the United Nations made was broken, as again and again, genocides and other forms of mass murder killed 170 million people, more than all the international wars of the twentieth century combined.

Why?  Why are there still genocides?  Why are there genocidal massacres going on right now in southern Sudan by the Sudanese government against Dinka, Nuer, and Nuba; in eastern Burma by the Burmese government against the Karen; in the Democratic Republic of the Congo by both government and rebel forces against Tutsis, Banyamulenge, Hutus, Hema, and Lendu?  Why has ethnic and religious hatred again reached the boiling point in Israel and Palestine; Côte d’Ivoire, and Burundi?                                                     

There are two reasons why genocide is still committed in the world:

1.        The world has not developed the international institutions needed to predict and prevent it.

2.        The world’s leaders do not have the political will to stop it.

In order to prevent genocide, we must first understand it.  We must study and compare genocides and develop a working theory about the genocidal process.  There are many Centers for the Study of Genocide that are doing that vital work – in Australia, Brussels, Copenhagen, Jerusalem, Montreal, Memphis, Minneapolis, New Haven, Nottingham, and elsewhere.

But studying genocide is not enough.  Our next task should be to create the international institutions and political will to prevent it.  Four institutions are needed: centers for early warning, programs for conflict transformation, standing forces for rapid intervention, and international courts for effective punishment.

1.  The U.N. Security Council and key governments need strong, independent Early Warning systems to predict where and when ethnic conflict and genocide are going to occur, and to present policy options on prevention and intervention.  The Brahimi report made by the special commission on U.N. Peace-keeping makes just such a recommendation, and it should be implemented.  Selected country desk officers and top officials of the U.N. system now hold monthly “Framework for Coordination” to discuss current crises, but inadequate staffing prevents long-range strategic planning.  There is not a single person at the United Nations whose responsible for genocide early warning and prevention.  Who do you call? Ghostbusters.

:P

<span>
</span>
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
During the late 1970s and early 1980s civil rights political gains included the election of big city mayors and the commemoratio
ale4655 [162]
Your answer is true
8 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Under the feudal system, who owned the land (known as a fief) provided to a knight in exchange for money or loyalty
    5·1 answer
  • How did the Radicals divide the south? By creating new voting districts By keeping them from participating in the government By
    11·1 answer
  • How does Shakespeare explore the assassination of Julius caesar?
    9·1 answer
  • Why are Southeast Asian countries gaining their independence after World War II? 
    5·1 answer
  • Which revision would help make this paragraph more coherent?
    15·1 answer
  • Insert your own news caption below describing how ethnic rivalries and alliances systems propelled the world into ww1
    7·2 answers
  • Which was not found in the ancient maya culture? A. pyramids B. heiroglyphics C. ball courts D. roof gardens
    15·2 answers
  • When was ronald reagan president of the united states?
    8·1 answer
  • How did expansion and global trade affect the economies of European countries during the 15th to 18th centuries?
    15·2 answers
  • The Battle of Austerlitz took place during which war?
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!