Answer:
Called the clients and cancelled jobs
Explanation:
If the plaintiff worked for the defendant and left to set up her own cleaning business, then she will most likely be bound by a non-compete clause.
So if she is saying she acted with the value of integrity, then she would called any of the defendant's clients and cancelled jobs in order to respect the non-compete clause.
However after sometime the non-compete clause is no longer binding.
Answer:
a. yes no
Explanation:
At the time of contract the service revenue is not been realized because service is been perform and dealer made a promise to perform services in future. So the revenue will be deferred and will be earned or realized when service will be performed in the future. Deferred revenue will be effected and service revenue will not be effected at the time of contract.
Answer:
$ 210 million
Explanation:
Data provided :
Taxable income for the current year = $ 300 million
Tax rate of the income = 40%
therefore, the income tax for the current year = 0.40 × $ 300 million
or
the income tax for the current year = $ 120 million
Decrease in the deferred tax assets = $ 30 million
Increase in the deferred tax liabilities = $ 60 million
Hence,
the total income tax expense for the year
= $ 120 million + $ 30 million + $ 60 million
or
= $ 210 million
