Answer: * = 36x^2
Note: Im guessing you're here for rsm struggles. That's how I found this question. I searched the web for the answer to this rsm problem, but I couldnt find it. I was happy to find this brainly link, but annoyed to find it was unanswered. I did the problem, and now i'll help future rsm strugglers out. Thanks for posting this question.
Step-by-step explanation:
Ok, so we know that trinomials like this are squares of binomials. this in mind, we know that it can also be written as (x+y)^2. (also brainly's exponents feature used to be better, if the exponents are confusing you, comment.) Using the (x+y)^2 equation, you know that by simplifying it, you get x^2+2xy+y^2. Basically we're looking for x^2. Using the middle term, 2xy, or 12x in this equation, we can find x. since we know the square root of 1 is 1, we know 12=2x. This is kinda confusing, but basically since the answer is 6, we know that the x-term is 6x. We square 6x and get 36x^2. guaranteed to work on the rsm student portal, i'm in rsm and i just answered this question.
Hope this helps! Also, im not usually too active on brainly unless im looking for HW answers, so if you understand this explanation and you see a confused comment, help out a friend and answer it. Happy holidays!
Do you notice anything strange about those points ?
(0, 1),
(1, 2),
(2, 4),
(3, 8).
The y-coordinate of each point is (2) raised to the power of the x-coordinate.
First point: x=0, y=2⁰ = 1
Second point: x=1, y=2¹ = 2
Third point: x=2, y=2² = 4
Fourth point: x=3, y=2³ = 8
The equation of the curve appears to be
y = 2 ^ x .
So, after 10 hours, x=10, and y = 2¹⁰ = 1,024 .
Answer:
The entire volume would be 60m, but if it's talking only about the little rectangle on top then the answer is 6m.
Step-by-step explanation:
The length of the smaller object is 1m, the height is 2m, and the width is 3m (as seen to the right side near the bigger block).
Multiply all those numbers together (1×2=2, 2×3=6 or just simply 1×2×3=6)
Answer:
B is the answer because yes
Answer:
6
reduce the expression and if possible do that by cancelling the common factors :)
