Answer: All these factors caused the expansion of Western society and new geographical discoveries.
Explanation:
It is like a man to search for the unknown and seek answers. After the Renaissance, the world became a freer place. Individuals like Christopher Columbus or Vasco de Gama were prominent individuals in the societies in which they lived. They expressed a desire to discover new sea routes and embark on a "journey to the unknown". For this purpose, they used new technological achievements such as the compass and advances in science, specifically cartography. In these efforts, the states or kingdoms saw an opportunity for profit and colonization, so they decided to finance these expeditions.
Answer:
B
Explanation:
The answer choices were
A. It shows a matriarchal society where women made important decisions.
B. It depicts a realistic scene showing ordinary people doing ordinary things.
C. It uses marble imported from Egypt and Persia as a base material.
D. It mixes the various cultures that were a part of Alexander’s empire.
The picture was simple, so it's not going to be A or D.
You cant tell what base material they used.
I chose B and got it right.
Answer:
The Pennsylvania colony encouraged the conversion of Native Americans to Christianity. The Pennsylvania colony established the Anglican Church as the head of the government. The Pennsylvania colony sought to exclude the practice of Christianity. The Pennsylvania colony was tolerant of different sects of Christianity
Explanation:
What are the options? Or “the following”
As I understand it, Laissez-faire ideology maintains that the "free market" is the best way to determine what businesses can and should do. This means that businesses, in competition with one another, should be free to determine their paths free from any government rules or regulations. The belief is that the competition among various businesses will ultimately result in the best outcomes for society in general - Adam Smith's "invisible hand". As part of this philosophy, workers should also be free to compete with each other and choose to work wherever they wish and this process will also result in the best results for the workers as well.
However, isn't there a huge assumption in this philosophy? Doesn't the whole justification of this belief depends on the condition that there is perfect competition and that any company and any worker have the equal ability to compete with one another?
What if there is no perfect competition? What if some companies have advantages - due to any of a whole array of reasons - that place them in a non-competitive position vis a vis their competitors? Without perfect competition then other companies are not necessarily able to compete with other companies that have certain advantages. If such a situation exists, then advantaged companies may have the ability to pursue a course that results in their private benefit, but not necessarily to the benefit of society as a whole. The same would apply to workers in that reduced competition among companies would result in decreased leverage for potential employees.
To recap, if the Laissez-faire ideology maintains the best economic policy for society as a whole, and it depends on there being perfect competition on an ongoing basis with minimal government intervention, doesn't it fall apart if there is less than the perfect competition?
