1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
dolphi86 [110]
3 years ago
14

Which of the following was not a positive effect of farming tribes slash and burn technique?

History
2 answers:
vfiekz [6]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

a

Explanation:

sleet_krkn [62]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Slash-and-burn agriculture, also called fire-fallow cultivation, is a farming method that involves the cutting and burning of plants in a forest or woodland to create a field called a swidden. The method begins by cutting down the trees and woody plants in an area. The downed vegetation, or "slash", is then left to dry, usually right before the rainiest part of the year. Then, the biomass is burned, resulting in a nutrient-rich layer of ash which makes the soil fertile, as well as temporarily eliminating weed and pest species. After about three to five years, the plot's productivity decreases due to depletion of nutrients along with weed and pest invasion, causing the farmers to abandon the field and move over to a new area. The time it takes for a swidden to recover depends on the location and can be as little as five years to more than twenty years, after which the plot can be slashed and burned again, repeating the cycle.In India, the practice is known as jhum or jhoom.

You might be interested in
Plllllllllllsssss someone HELLLLLPPPP... Its very urgent
Troyanec [42]

Answer:

The North American Free Trade Agreement created the world's largest free trade area, covering the United States, Canada, and Mexico. In 2017, its member economies generated approximately $22.2 trillion in gross domestic product. NAFTA is also controversial. Politicians don't agree on whether the free trade agreement's advantages outweigh its disadvantages. Here they are so you can decide for yourself.

Pros

NAFTA has six main advantages. According to a Congressional Research Service report prepared in 2017, the act has more than tripled trade between Canada, Mexico, and the United States since it was enacted.1  The agreement reduced and eliminated tariffs. Second, greater trade increased economic output. While it is challenging to weigh the impact of NAFTA given the variety of factors involved, experts estimated that full NAFTA implementation would U.S. growth by as much as 0.5% a year.2  Third, while there are varying estimates, stronger growth created jobs. According to a 2010 report, U.S. free trade agreements – the lion's share of which stemmed from the NAFTA agreement – directly supported 5.4 million jobs, while trade with these countries supported 17.7 million.3   Fourth, foreign direct investment (FDI) more than tripled. The United States increased FDI in Mexico from $15.2 billion in 1993 to $104.4 billion in 2012, and from $69.9 billion in Canada in 1993 to $352.9 billion in 2015. Mexico ramped up investment in the United States by 1283% over the same time period, while Canada's FDI increased by 911%. Fifth, NAFTA lowered prices. U.S. oil imports from Mexico cost less because NAFTA got rid of tariffs. That reduces America's reliance on oil from the Middle East. Low-cost oil reduces gas prices, which reduces transportation cost. Food prices are lower in turn. 4  Sixth, the agreement helped with government spending. Each nation's government contracts became available to suppliers in all three member countries. That increased competition and lowered costs.

Cons

NAFTA has six main disadvantages. First, certain estimates indicate that it led to job losses. A 2011 report from the Economic Policy Institute estimated a loss of 682,900 jobs.5  Other estimates estimate a loss of 500,000-750,000 U.S. jobs. Most were in the manufacturing industries in California, New York, Michigan, and Texas. Though the estimated job gains exceed those lost, certain industries were particularly impacted, including manufacturing, automotive, textile, computer, and electrical appliance industries. Second, job migration suppressed wages. Companies threatened to move to Mexico to keep workers from joining unions.6  Without the unions, workers could not bargain for better wages. This strategy was so successful that it became standard operating procedure. Between 1993 and 1995, half of all companies used it. By 1999, that rate had grown to 65%. Third, NAFTA put Mexican farmers out of business. It allowed U.S. government-subsidized farm products into Mexico. Local farmers could not compete with the subsidized prices. As a result, 1.3 million farmers were put out of business, according to the Economic Policy Institute.7  It forced unemployed farmers to cross the border illegally to find work. In 1995, there were 2.9 million Mexicans living in the United States illegally. It increased to 4.5 million in 2000, probably due to NAFTA.8  The recession drove that figure to 6.9 million in 2007. In 2014, it fell to 5.8 million, roughly double where it was before NAFTA. Fourth, unemployed Mexican farmers went to work in substandard conditions in the maquiladora program. Maquiladora is where United States-owned companies employ Mexican workers near the border. They cheaply assemble products for export back into the United States. Employment in maquiladoras rose 120,000 in 1980 to 1.2 million in 2006.9   Fifth, U.S. companies degraded the Mexican environment to keep costs low. Agribusiness in Mexico used more fertilizers and other chemicals, resulting in increased pollution.10  Rural farmers were forced into marginal land to stay in business, resulting in increased deforestation rates.11  That deforestation contributes to global warming. Sixth, NAFTA allowed Mexican trucks access into the United States. Mexican trucks are not held to the same safety standards as American trucks. Congress never allowed this provision to go into effect.

USMCA

Despite these advantages, the United States, Mexico, and Canada renegotiated NAFTA on September 30, 2018. The new deal is called the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement. It must be ratified by each country's legislature. Trump has called for Congress to ratify it within six months.14  If not ratified, it the U.S. will revert to pre-NAFTA trade conditions. If ratified, it will go into effect in 2020. The Trump administration renegotiated with the aim of lowering the trade deficit between the United States and Mexico.15  The new deal changes NAFTA in six major areas.16  

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Traffic on U.S. Highway 101 Slows as Giant Hot-Air Balloon
Gekata [30.6K]

Answer:

A. They are causally related because the emergency landing caused

traffic to slow down.

Explanation:

This is the only answer that makes sense. Hope this helps! If I am incorrect, please let me know. Have a good day!

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
_____ were the first Europeans to encounter North Americans.
kirill [66]
A) Vikings were the first Europeans to encounter North Americans. Although it is much less historically popular, the Vikings were the first Europeans to have interactions with the indigenous peoples of North America. The Vikings came to North America to pillage and raid the villages, but some were also involved in trade.
7 0
4 years ago
British government believed that many colonial merchants were doing what? *
noname [10]
The answer would be 4
4 0
3 years ago
Why would Greek kings and queens seek out Oracles?<br>please answer
Alex

Answer:

Explanation:

Oracles were not gods, but they apparently had special capabilities in order to speak with them from Earth.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Legislative bodies of the roman empire
    14·1 answer
  • The play Oedipus Rex was written by
    14·1 answer
  • What impact did the increasing number of immigrants have on the culture of Texas? In your answer, discuss how the different ethn
    8·2 answers
  • What is East or Asia’s economy based on (how do they make money)
    15·1 answer
  • What was the impact of Operation Urgent Fury?
    7·2 answers
  • This is a term that describes the severe anti-communist suspicion in the united states in the 1940s and 1950s.
    13·1 answer
  • How did the family structure of enslaved african americans help them survive life under slavery?
    8·2 answers
  • Question 19 of 20 :
    5·1 answer
  • Which of these is a power of the executive branch of the government?
    5·1 answer
  • During the revolutionary war, the Patriots used a military strategy designed to:
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!