Answer:
The strengths of a focus group are:
-it gives the moderator more open ideas to work with.
-it has low cost compared to other data methods.
-it speeds up the result collection of the selected topic.
Weaknesses of focus group are:
*It takes effort to assemble the group members.
*Complex data analysis.
*No individual answers.
Explanation:
Focus groups usually involves a number of participants having an open discussion on a specific topic, set by a moderator, usually the person that comes up with the specific topic for focus. The function of a focus group is to collect data through group interactions on a selected topic.
The strengths of a focus group are:
-it gives the moderator more open ideas to work with.
-it has low cost compared to other data methods.
-it speeds up the result collection of the selected topic.
Weaknesses of focus group are:
*It takes effort to assemble the group members.
*Complex data analysis.
*No individual answers.
Answer:
I'd uhh cycfuvuvuvuvyvuvuuvuvv
Explanation:
A similar question was asked online, here is the answer it gave:
'“Negative control” is a treatment that by definition is expected not to have any effect (neither positive effect, nor negative effect). “Positive control” is treatment with a well-known chemical that is known to produce the expected effect with the assay that you are studying. Application of an antagonist is not a negative control in your case. “Negative control” is condition that should be treated with the same solutions or buffers as your “treatment” condition, with the only difference that instead of the chemical that you investigate you should add just the solvent that was used to dissolve you chemical in the respective final concentration that you have in the “experimental treatment” condition. For example if your chemical is dissolved in DMSO – than the correct negative control will be to add to the medium/buffer just DMSO in the same final concentration that you reach with your “treatment” condition. One of the reasons of using such negative control is to verify that the solvent is having no effect in your assay. Note that among all treatment conditions (“negative control”, “positive control”, “experimental treatment you are investigating”) the volumes and the composition of the treatments that you are doing should be uniform: always treat with the same volume of medium or buffer, always containing the same concentration of the used solvent (e.g., DMSO). The only difference should be the presence or absence of the defined compound-treatments (agonist, antagonist, the chemical for the experimental investigation etc.).'
My best advice is to use the textbook you have, or use examples of a negative control when testing organic compounds because you have to find something that you can assign, like a worm in a box of dirt, the worm could have enough food to survive, so that is your negative control, but when it comes to finding the best, that would have to rely on something within the parameters of being self sufficient like a plant getting its energy from photosynthesis, etc.
Atanasov, Atanas. (2013). Re: Positive control and negative control. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/post/Positive_control_and_negative_control/515968f2d039b1fe50000025/citation/download.
Answer:
The hollow organs that make up the GI tract are the mouth, esophagus, stomach, small intestine, large intestine, and anus. The liver, pancreas, and gallbladder are the solid organs of the digestive system.
Writers note:
Who ever gave you that question is a horrible being. The digestive tract is quite complex. I hope I helped in some way; sorry if I confused you.
