The answers is x =3 , x= -10
Since the numbers are consecutive, they must be near each other in size, and therefore near one-third of 168. And since the lower number is -2 off the middle, and the upper number is +2 from the middle, the middle number must be exactly one-third of 168—otherwise the sum of the three could never be 168. Labelling the three consecutive numbers as x, y, and z:
x + y + z = 168
(y-2) + y + (y+2) = 168.
3y = 168
y = 56
therefore the smallest number (x) = 54.
436 viewsView upvotes
1
Related Questions (More Answers Below)
Answer:
vwgshsbbdbdbgsgsvbshdbzvbzvzvz vs vs zvjdnbsndjjshshhshshbhbbsnsndbbdbdbdbdbbdbdbdbbdbdbsnjehhebejdjhshhdhehsbjsg...bsbbsbshhshs
hshhehebehhejeksjjsjaj
bhehgshz
dbshbsbbbhhghhbgqshjsudhebrhdhdhndksgwtsh
svvsbsbsbbshsbsggeggsg
Step-by-step explanation:
vwgshsbbdbdbgsgsvbshdbzvbzvzvz vs vs zvjdnbsndjjshshhshshbhbbsnsndbbdbdbdbdbbdbdbdbbdbdbsnjehhebejdjhshhdhehsbj
sg...bsbbsbshhshshshhehebehhejeksjjsjaj
bhehgs
hzbdbshbsbbbhhghhbgqshjsudhebrhdhdhndksgwtshsvvsbsbsbbshsbsggeggsg
No because the lines are not connecting. The definition of a function is a relationship involving one or more variables. This can't be a function because their is only one variable.
Not gonna lie i have no idea LOL
