C because it’s the answer
Answer and Explanation:
Kant's principle of universalizability suggests that we do what we feel should be generalised or in his words universalised. I'm there words for something to be considered morally valid it should be generally satisfactory and not just apply to one person
On the other hand his principle of humanity suggests that we do those things that treat each human being as though he is the end not the means. In other words, we do not consider another human being to be something that could be used to achieve another thing but the sole purpose or end for which anything is done
The above do have contradictory applications since by generalizing a thing we could still be using a human being and not making him the end in this respect. I believe the best of the two principles however is the humanity principle since by holding this principle dear every human being would treat each other better and the universalizability principle would still apply.
It was better for growing crops. A stable climate ensured a surplus of agricultural produce during these phases, slowly leading to the evolution of cities.
Answer:
the work of executive is execute the laws made by legislature.
the work of legislature is to make laws for the citizens.
the work of the judiciary is to ensure that there is no misuse of power by the legislature and executive.
Explanation:
hope this helps you!!!
ITSCHOCOLOVER
The tense that is applicable when describing physical, emotional and mental states in the past would be an IMPERFECT tense. Imperfect tense is usually used in other languages and comprises of past tense and and imperfective aspect. One language that uses this tense is the Spanish language.
