All categories

3 years ago

What two events in the 1950s raised the attention for improving the fitness levels of U.S. children?

1 answer:

6 0

The correct answer is A) President Eisenhower's heart attack and the publication of a study reporting that American children were less fit than European children.

The two events in the 1950s that raised the attention for improving the fitness levels of U.S. children were President Eisenhower's heart attack and the publication of a study reporting that American children were less fit than European children.

After World War II, the US government started to pay attention to the physical fitness of Americans. The young Americans started to gain weight and were out of shape. In the military, officers noted that many soldiers were out of shape in WWII and the Korean War, and officers did not like that. Then, it came the publication of an international study that reported that American children were less fit than European children, and that worried President Eisenhower who signed Executive Order 10673 of July 16, 1956: the creation of the President's Council of Youth Fitness.

You might be interested in

Sterling Cooper and Co. refers applicants to various jobs in the local community which may range from warehouse jobs, to deliver

Bezzdna [24]

The question of whether Sterling Cooper and Co.’s <em>application process </em>is problematic under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act is:

A. No, Sterling Cooper and Co.’s application process likely does not raise concerns Title VII of the Civil Rights Act.

<h3>Title VII of the Civil Rights Act</h3>

This refers to the clause within the Civil Rights Act which prohibits employers from discriminating prospective workers on the grounds of their race, color, religion, gender or country.

With this in mind, we can see that Sterling Cooper and Co made use of an application process which had to do with checking if the prospective employee has been convicted of a felony. This does not violate the Civil Rights Act Title VII in any way.

Therefore, the correct answer is option A

Read more about Civil Rights Act here:

brainly.com/question/10584148

3 0

3 years ago

"A state becomes good if it's people are good" justify the statement

snow_lady [41]

Answer:

The state is good when the people in it are good. In any country government and its governance plays a very vital role in giving shape to the future of that country but there is a huge difference between good and bad governance.

Explanation:

Hope it will help you

6 0

2 years ago

Officers of special districts are __________, which indicates that while they often operate independently, they truly are interg

Nastasia [14]

its definitely the choice D.

Either elected by the general public or appointed by state and local representatives.

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Ignoring the attention-getting behavior of hyperactive children can be a helpful tool to classroom teachers because often the fr

Romashka [77]

Answer:

The operant conditioning process which such technique utilizes is known as Extinction.

Explanation:

Extinction is said to have occurred when a previously learned behavior disappears simply because it is not being reinforced or entertained by someone or something else.

Taking an example from the question, the children in the classroom get the attention of their teacher by being hyperactive. However, when the teacher chose to ignore such attention-getting behavior from the students, they gradually become less hyperactive and in extension, less misbehaving.

It would eventually get to the point which they no longer crave for attention by misbehaving. When that happens, extinction is said to have occurred.

7 0

3 years ago

"With his "principle of liberty," John Stuart Mill rejects the notion of "victimless crime," where the state has no right to cri

lbvjy [14]

Answer:

True.

Explanation:

The given statement would be considered true as it asserts a true claim about J.S. Mill's 'principle of liberty' denying the conception of 'victimless crime'. He stated that individual actions should only be restricted when it is causing damage to others. He proclaimed that "the only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilized community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others". In simple terms, he stated that no one should be prevented from doing a specific action unless his/her actions are not invasive or harmful to the other's rights. Therefore, the given assertion is <u>true.</u>

3 0

3 years ago