1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Margarita [4]
2 years ago
14

Cesar Chavez was a labor leader and activist who fought for higher wages for farm workers.

Social Studies
1 answer:
spayn [35]2 years ago
4 0

Answer:

fact

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Sanctions can be applied by an institution in order to:
djyliett [7]
It’s C, punish people for disobeying rules and regulations.
5 0
3 years ago
Janine completed several tours of duty in afghanistan. she suffers from ptsd. now, back home in texas, she is frightened by fire
denis23 [38]
It reflects a process of Stimulus <span>Generalization
Stimulus </span><span>Generalization refers to a situation when conditioned stimulus  has the tendency to evoke similar responses after it has been conditioned.
Due to The Fact janine has condiiton every sound as a source of danger when she's on the war zone, the similar sound may caused her to feel that she's still there even though she's came back home.</span>
3 0
3 years ago
How has the United Kingdom maintained an important role in world affairs
kenny6666 [7]

The UK's world role: Great Britain's greatness fixation

Editorial

Mon 25 Jan 2010 00.05 GMT First published on Mon 25 Jan 2010 00.05 GMT

Shares

3

Comments

130

In some eyes, but most notably its own, the British government will be in the driving seat of world events this week. Today, G7 finance ministers will be in London to discuss inter­national banking reform and the transaction tax, and – in the claim that the City minister, Paul Myners, makes on our comment pages today – the UK will be "leading international efforts". On Wednesday, diplomats from around the world will meet here to discuss the threat to Yemen from al-Qaida. A day later, attention shifts to another international conference in London, this time on the imperilled future of Afghanistan. Quite a week.

Every country likes to be taken seriously around the world. Lots of nations like to feel they are punching their weight, or even above it. Only a few, however, seem to feel the need to promote themselves as the one the others all look to for leadership. It is one thing – though never uncontroversial, and in some contexts increasingly implausible – for the United States to see itself in this role. As the world's largest economic and military power, the US remains even now the necessary nation in international affairs. It is quite another thing for Britain to pretend to such a status.

Advertisement

The continuing pre-eminence of American clout has been starkly shown by what has happened in banking over the last several days. Domestic political pressures spurred President Obama into declaring a war on the money men, and markets worldwide immediately trembled, as they grasped that his plan could unleash a global drive to split retail and investment banking. There should be no shame for London in wholeheartedly welcoming the initiative while admitting that Britain could never have made such a move on its own. Instead, however, the government carries on as if its own detailed plans for banks' living wills, and its distant dreams of a Tobin tax, are framing the debate.

Britain is a very important country. The sixth-largest economy in the world. The fifth-largest military power. Its claim to what the former prime minister Lord Home used to call a seat at the top table is beyond dispute, though it would be a still more influential one if we sometimes ceded it to the European Union. And yet, more than half a century after the loss of empire, our political culture still seems racked by the need to be the leading nation, not just one of them. Such delusions are most associated with the political right, but Gordon Brown can also seem peculiarly ensnared by them. His Britain must always be first, always at the forefront, must always show the way to the rest. Even in the G7, the G8 or the G20 – never mind the UN – a mere share of the action is never enough, and it must always be Britain that is leading the effort, whether in Yemen or Afghanistan. But this way hubris lies. Mr Brown immodestly let slip to MPs in 2008 that he had saved the world. And as he arrived in Copenhagen for the ill-fated climate change summit last month he announced that "There are many outstanding issues which I'm here to resolve."

In reality, of course, no single nation can resolve the world's problems alone. Only the United States and China, separately or together, can even aspire to set the agenda for the rest. If the US raises its commitment to Afghanistan then other nations are likely to follow. If the US penalises the banks, others soon fall into line.

Britain has no such potency. Yet we still struggle to adjust to our reality. We can propose, as we shall be doing in three important London meetings this week, but we cannot dispose. Every day, the descant of the Chilcot inquiry reminds us of where the refusal to recognise this truth can humiliatingly lead. Our national interest should be to play our important role as a true, trusted and committed European partner on the world stage. No longer the greatest. Just one great among others. Good enough ought to be good enough. The people get it. If only the politicians did too.


7 0
3 years ago
The governor's power of appointment is the most significant of the executive powers because it allows the governor to appoint a.
sertanlavr [38]

Answer:

The answer is "Option a".

Explanation:

The Governors were responsible for the formulation of national legislation and for supervising the operation of the federal government. While government officials adopt and implement new and updated policies and strategies, including signing statements, expenditures, policy proposals, or vetoes, the Governor may appoint individuals on numerous agencies, committees, and committees in Texas.

3 0
3 years ago
Can you move out when your 16 in the state of New York without parent consent?
motikmotik

Answer:

I'm pretty sure u can as long as ur parents agree with the move

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Please help, will give brainlist.
    12·1 answer
  • Which statement below accurately matches the characteristics of an ethnic group? (44 a. 2) A. Esther reads the Quran daily, whil
    8·1 answer
  • Which was formed specifically to protect the united states from terrorism?
    7·1 answer
  • Which of these provisions of the Treaty of Versailles was the most crucial to what President Woodrow Wilson sought in the hope t
    12·1 answer
  • In a few lines explain what was Trail of Tears
    12·1 answer
  • PLEASE PLEASE HELP!! IT WOULD MEAN A LOTTT
    5·1 answer
  • Can somebody help me
    14·2 answers
  • What Evans have historians found of a golden age during the kingdom of Silla?
    9·1 answer
  • Which statement about this excerpt is correct? reagan uses allusion to remind his audiences of russian authors whose writings su
    14·1 answer
  • Which identified clinical manifestation would the nurse associate with those exhibited with a cluster headache?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!