<span><span>1. </span>Discuss the following statement: "Corporations are not
really run by their owners." Corporations are run by everyone who works
for the corporation and without everyone working together, it will not run
smoothly and bring in revenue.
</span>
<span>
2. Why might an investor choose to become a partner in a limited partnership
instead of purchasing the stock of an open corporation? If an investor decided
to join in a limited partnership instead of purchasing the stock on an open
corporation they would have less to do with the business side as they would in
an open corporation. When an investor joins in a limited partnership they have
less management responsibility and little to no liability besides their initial
investment.
</span>
<span>
3. Is growth a good thing for all firms? How does management know when a firm
is ready to grow? Growth is not a good thing for all firms. Depending on what a
company is looking to achieve long term, the financial assets they have now to
achieve their growth and other goals are all subject to what the company is
able to do with the finances and staffing they have. When a corporation is
trying to decide whether or not they should grow, management will examine all
aspects of the company to make sure they align with the growth plan.
</span>
<span>
4. If you were to start a business, which ownership form would you choose? What
factors might affect your choice? If I were to start a business, I would
probably choose a limited liability company (LLC) as the ownership form and
structure. An LLC is where the members within the company are not held personally
liable for the company’s debts or liabilities. Think ownership form works well
if you were to join forces an open up a business with a friend or family member.
An LLC keeps the tax side of the business easier as allowing the individuals to
be self-proprietors. When considering factors that may change this decision
they would include: who I am going in business with, what I am in business for,
my end goals, current goals and current financial status. </span>
Answer:
U.S. Tax Burden on Cola:
The amount of the tax on a case of cola is $4 per case. Of this amount, the burden that falls on consumers is $1 per case, and the burden that falls on producers is ___$3______ per case.
The effect of the tax on the quantity sold would have been larger if the tax had been levied on consumers.
a. True
b. False
Explanation:
The tax burden on consumers, which is represented by the difference in the price of cola from $5 to $6 per unit is $1 ($6 - $5). However, the cash received by producers reduced by $3 from $5 to $2. This shows that the total tax burden on both consumers and producers is $4 ($1 + $3).
This represents a total tax burden of $4 or about 67% based on the new selling price of cola or 80% based on the old selling price of cola.
"The effect of the tax on the quantity sold would have been larger if the tax had been levied on consumers alone. This because the price of cola would have increased to $9 per unit. Since the demand for cola in this instance is elastic, this change in price would have caused a more than 80% change in the quantity demanded.
The officer responsible for managing the firm's cash flows is the <span>treasurer</span>.
Answer:
15 years
Explanation:
The target accumulated future amount is the future value of the initial investment(present value), hence, using the future value formula provided below we can determine the investment time horizon in years required to accumulate the target amount:
FV=PV*(1+r)^n
FV=$1,200,000
PV=$287,270
r=10%
n=investment period in years=unknown
$1,200,000=$287,270*(1+10%)^n
$1,200,000/$287,270=(1+10%)^n
$1,200,000/$287,270=(1.10)^n
take log of both sides
ln($1,200,000/$287,270)=n ln(1.10)
n=ln($1,200,000/$287,270)/ln(1.10)
n=15.00years
