1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
agasfer [191]
2 years ago
14

What 4 rights did the US supreme Court feel were guaranteed to Miranda after reviewing the case?

History
1 answer:
andrew-mc [135]2 years ago
3 0

Answer: In Miranda v. Arizona (1966), the Supreme Court ruled that detained criminal suspects, before police questioning, must be informed of their constitutional right to an attorney and against self-incrimination. The case began with the 1963 arrest of Phoenix resident Ernesto Miranda, who was charged with ra pe, kidna pping, and rob bery. Miranda was not informed of his rights before the police interrogation. During the two-hour interrogation, Miranda allegedly confessed to committing the crimes, which the police apparently recorded. Miranda, who had not finished ninth grade and had a history of mental instability, had no counsel present. At trial, the prosecution's case consisted solely of his confession. Miranda was convicted of both ra pe and kidnapping and sentenced to 20 to 30 years in prison. He appealed to the Arizona Supreme Court, claiming that the police had unconstitutionally obtained his confession. The court disagreed, however, and upheld the conviction. Miranda appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, which reviewed the case in 1966.

Explanation:

hope this help

You might be interested in
NEED HELP ASAP!!!!
Gennadij [26K]

to take the Holy Land back from the Islamic Empires

the first cruscade was a relgous battle to take jerusalum

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A GBMI decision in a trial means what?
sladkih [1.3K]
It means that the person is mentally ill but is still responsible for the crimes that were committed.
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Compare the results of the boston police strike and the steel strike?
Luden [163]

In the Boston Police Strike, Boston police officers went on strike on September 9, 1919. They sought recognition for their trade union and improvements in wages and working conditions. Police Commissioner Edwin Upton Curtis denied that police officers had any right to form a union, much less one affiliated with a larger organization like the American Federation of Labor (AFL). Attempts at reconciliation between the Commissioner and the police officers, particularly on the part of Boston's Mayor Andrew James Peters, failed.

During the strike, Boston experienced several nights of lawlessness. Several thousand members of the State Guard, supported by volunteers, restored order. Press reaction both locally and nationally described the strike as Bolshevik-inspired and directed at the destruction of civil society. The strikers were called "deserters" and "agents of Lenin."[1]

Samuel Gompers of the AFL recognized that the strike was damaging the cause of labor in the public mind and advised the strikers to return to work. Commissioner Curtis refused to re-hire the striking policemen. He was supported by Massachusetts Governor Calvin Coolidge, whose rebuke of Gompers earned him a national reputation. The strike proved a setback for labor unions, and the AFL discontinued its attempts to organize police officers for another two decades. Coolidge won the Republican nomination for vice-president of the U.S. in the 1920 presidential election.n 1895, the Massachusetts legislature transferred control of the Boston police department from Boston's mayor to the governor of Massachusetts, whom it authorized to appoint a five-person board of commissioners to manage the department. In 1906, the legislature abolished that board and gave the governor the authority to name a single commissioner to a term of five years, subject to removal by the governor. The mayor and the city continued to have responsibility for the department's expenses and the physical working conditions of its employees, but the commissioner controlled department operations and the hiring, training, and discipline of the police officers.[2]

In 1918, the salary for patrolmen was set at $1,400 a year. Police officers had to buy their own uniforms and equipment which cost over $200. New recruits received $730 during their first year, which increased annually to $821.25 and $1000, and to $1,400 after six years.[3] In the years following World War I, inflation dramatically eroded the value of a police officer's salary. From 1913 to May 1919, the cost of living rose by 76%, while police wages rose just 18%.[2] Discontent and restiveness among the Boston police force grew as they compared their wages and found they were earning less than an unskilled steelworker, half as much as a carpenter or mechanic and 50 cents a day less than a streetcar conductor. Boston city laborers were earning a third more on an hourly basis.[3]

Police officers had an extensive list of grievances. They worked ten-hour shifts and typically recorded weekly totals between 75 and 90 hours.[a] They were not paid for time spent on court appearances.[2] They also objected to being required to perform such tasks as "delivering unpaid tax bills, surveying rooming houses, taking the census, or watching the polls at election" and checking the backgrounds of prospective jurors as well as serving as "errand boys" for their officers.[5] They complained about having to share beds and the lack of sanitation, baths, and toilets[2] at many of the 19 station houses where they were required to live, most of which dated to before the Civil War. The Court Street station had four toilets for 135 men, and one bathtub.


4 0
3 years ago
Explain the impacts of immigration and urbanization on the rise of global economy. Make sure to provide specific examples.
azamat

Answer:

The potential of urbanization to promote growth is likely to depend on how conducive the infrastructure and institutional settings are. Removing barriers to rural–urban mobility may enable economic growth, but the benefits will be much larger with supportive policies, markets and infrastructure investments.

immigrants help grow the economy by filling labor needs, purchasing goods and paying taxes. When more people work, productivity increases.

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
To understand political power right, and derive it from its original, we must consider, what state all men are naturally in, and
TEA [102]

B. To explain life without government

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected the
    9·2 answers
  • What did the colonists do to let the British parliament know they were against new taxes?
    14·1 answer
  • Most accidents, in fact about 85% to 98%, are caused by...
    13·1 answer
  • Tge truman doctrine and the marshall plan represented attempts by the united states to deal with the
    14·1 answer
  • Several major cities hosted exhibitions of new technology and entertainment during the Gilded Age. How did exhibitions like thes
    5·1 answer
  • What innovation enabled the maya to adapt to their tropical environment and build a great civilization
    7·1 answer
  • Why did english settlers settle in the southern colonies
    11·1 answer
  • Who was the leader of Soviet Union during the WW2
    6·2 answers
  • In what ways does unemployment hurt the economy
    8·2 answers
  • Plez help larasel will give brainliest I
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!