Answer:
The answers are:
- Professional fees to issue the corporation’s stock
- Commissions paid by the corporation to underwriters for stock issue
- Printing costs to issue the corporation’s stock
Explanation:
Organizational costs are the initial costs incurred when creating a company. They usually include legal and registration fees, promotions, and commissions paid.
After 10/22/2004, organizational cost up to $5,000 can be deducted as an expense. The remaining organizational costs can be amortized over fifteen years.
Answer:
Total sum at te end of 6 years=$ 73,138.97
Explanation:
<em>The total sum in Lee's account at the end of year would be determined as follows:</em>
FV= A × (1+r)^n
FV- Future sum?,
A- deposit amount ,
r- interest rate - 9%/2 = 4.5% per 6 months
n- number of years is 6
First deposit for 6 years
FV = 15,000× 1.045^(2×6)
= $25,438.22
Last 40,000 for 2 years
FV = 40,000 1.045^(2×2)
=47,700.74403
Total sum at the end of 6 years
= $25,438.22 + $47,700.74
=$ 73,138.97
Is this a theory type of question?
If it is and if it took place under president Calvin Coolidge then taxes likely would have gone up.
If you are talking about now, then investment might go up but in order to pay for it, the government will just print more money, so that taxes shouldn't go up.
I'd pick C.
Answer:
current intrinsic value per stock = $26.35
Explanation:
year dividend EPS
0 0 $18
1 0 $20.88
2 0 $24.22
3 0 $28.10
4 0 $32.59
5 0 $37.81
6 $12.59 $41.97
growth rate up to year 5 = 16%
ROE growth rate starting year 6 = 11%
dividend growth rate starting year 6 = 11% x (1 - 30%) = 7.7%
cost of equity = 24%
horizon value at year 5 = $12.59 / (24% - 7.7%) = $77.24
current intrinsic value per stock = $77.24 / 1.24%⁵ = $26.35
Answer:
The Home owner commenced the action in a state A court ( C )
Explanation:
The Defendant ( the contractor) can decide to transfer the case from a state court to a federal court within the same state in which the case was filled by the The home owner if the federal court has the Jurisdiction to rule on the case
Since the contract was signed in state A under the laws of the state the case is definitely a state case and the Homeowner's move to remand the case to a state court with the argument that the Federal court lacks proper Jurisdiction is in order. The court decision on the matter will be based on the fact that the Homeowner commenced the action in a state A court where the contract was signed.