Answer:
B. different communication elements work together to create something different, and greater, than the sum of its parts
Explanation:
According to the Synergestic Model of Communication, people engaging in a communication process will act together combining elements that result in a whole greater and different than the sum of its parts.
This means there is a shift in traditional views of communication.
Examples of synergestic communication: sports teams , sportclubs and professional settings, like team building.
In all these instances a sense of exchange of ideas takes place and makes the goals and communication to be in one spirit.
The outcome results in a positive and rewarding experience for everyone.
Answer:
So the answer is be 35 or older and a U.S. citizen by birth
Explanation:
Legal requirements for presidential candidates have remained the same since the year Washington accepted the presidency. As directed by the Constitution, a presidential candidate must be a natural born citizen of the United States, a resident for 14 years, and 35 years of age or older.
<span>William F. Whyte used observation to study Italian street-corner men. He was a sociologist noted for his studies of urban sociology.</span>
Answer:
Andrew can sue Robert for breach of contract.
Explanation:
A contract case is presented before a judge if one or both parties claim that contract has been breached.
A breach of contract is like a failure to fulfill the promise that was a part of the contract. This is in legal terms. It can allow a party to sue the other party for making a contract breach.
Robert breached the contract as he did not pay the commission on the sale of his house to the buyer. So, Andrew can sue Robert for the same.
<span>One of the major advantages of judges being appointed is that they are usually chosen on their basis of how well they have done their jobs, are they fair, have they done exceptional work in deciding their cases judgements. One of the disadvantages is that sometimes bad judges can slip thru the cracks when appointed that may not have the right moral compass to judge cases fairly. As such some judges can also be swayed to look the otherway on issues that they strongly oppose that their constituents may favor.</span>
