Answer:
the efficiency variance for variable overhead setup costs is $4,810 favorable
Explanation:
The computation of the efficiency variance for variable overhead setup costs is shown below;
= ((15,700 ÷ 265) × 4.25) × $45 - ((15,700 ÷ 325) × 3) × $45
= $11,330.6604 - $6,521.5384
= $4,809.12 favorable
= $4,810 favorable
hence, the efficiency variance for variable overhead setup costs is $4,810 favorable
Answer:
Jack has claim while Jill didn't have.
Explanation:
Jack has claim against Deuce Hardware because his performance is tremendous and make more sales for the company. He done his work very well so he can claim against Deuce Hardware Supplies while on the other hand, Jill has no claim against Deuce Hardware because he commit a crime on the basis of which the company has the authority to terminate him from the job. He works very well in the company but his crime is big enough to terminate him.
Answer:
1) many buyers and sellers, (2) free entry and exit
Explanation:
A monopolistic competition is when there are many buyers and sellers of heterogeneous goods and services. There are free entry of firms into and out of the industry. Firms set the price for their products. Buyers and sellers do not have perfect information. In the long run, monopolistic competition make zero economic profit.
A pure competition is characterised by many buyers and sellers of homogenous goods and services. Buyers and sellers have perfect information. There are no barriers to entry or exit of firms in the industry. Market price is set by the market forces. Firms make zero economic profit in the long run.
I hope my answer helps you
Answer:
$284,000
Explanation:
Movements in the retained earnings account are as a result of the payment of dividend and the addition of the income or loss for the year.
Given that
Baxter generated revenues = $40,000
incurred expenses = $24,000
purchased equipment = $10,000 and
paid dividends = $4,000
Net income/(loss) = $40,000 - $24,000
= $16,000
Retained Earnings at September 30, 2012
= $272,000 + $16,000 - $4,000
= $284,000
Answer:
False
Explanation:
If an investment project can be repeated, i.e. its life cycle can be extended by reinvesting, the NPV of the project will change.
When considering two mutually exclusive projects, the NPV method should always be considered before the IRR as a means of evaluating which project should be carried out.
