1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
leonid [27]
3 years ago
3

NO LINKS OR ANSWERING QUESTIONS YOU DON'T KNOW!! Part 2.

Mathematics
2 answers:
Llana [10]3 years ago
6 0

9514 1404 393

Explanation:

<u>Definition</u>

The determinant of a square matrix is a single number that is computed (recursively) as the sum of products of the elements of a row or column and the determinants of their cofactors. The determinant of a single element is the value of that element.

The cofactor of an element in an n by n matrix is the (n-1) by (n-1) matrix that results when the row and column of that element are deleted. The "appropriate sign" of the element is applied to the cofactor matrix. The "appropriate sign" of an element is positive if the sum of its row and column numbers is even, negative otherwise. (Rows and columns are considered to be numbered 1 to n in an n by n matrix.)

<u>Uses</u>

The inverse of a square matrix is the transpose of the cofactor matrix, divided by the determinant. Hence <em>i</em><em>f the determinant is zero, the inverse matrix is undefined</em>. This means any system of equations the matrix might represent will have <em>no distinct solution</em>. (There may be zero solutions, or there may be an infinite number of solutions. The determinant by itself cannot tell you which.)

Cramer's Rule for the solution of linear systems of equations specifies that the value of any given variable is the ratio of the determinants of two matrices. The numerator matrix is the original matrix with the coefficients of the variable replaced by the constants in the standard-form equations; the denominator matrix is the original coefficient matrix. This rule lets you solve a system of 3 equations in 3 variables by computing 3+1 = 4 determinants, for example.

Olenka [21]3 years ago
3 0

Let's look at an example.

If we wanted to solve this system of equations

\begin{cases}2x-y = 2\\x+y = 7\end{cases}

Then it's equivalent to solving this matrix equation

\begin{bmatrix}2 & -1\\1 & 1\end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix}x\\y\end{bmatrix}=\begin{bmatrix}2\\7\end{bmatrix}

We can then further condense that into the form

Aw = B

Where,

A = \begin{bmatrix}2 & -1\\1 & 1\end{bmatrix}\\\\w = \begin{bmatrix}x\\y\end{bmatrix}\\\\B = \begin{bmatrix}2\\7\end{bmatrix}

------------------------------------------

To solve the matrix equation Aw = B, we could compute the inverse matrix A^{-1} and left-multiply both sides by this to isolate w.

So we'd go from Aw=B to w = A^{-1}*B. The order of multiplication is important.

For any 2x2 matrix of the form

P = \begin{bmatrix}a & b\\c & d\end{bmatrix}

its inverse is

P^{-1} = \frac{1}{ad-bc}\begin{bmatrix}d & -b\\-c & a\end{bmatrix}

Notice the expression ad-bc in the denominator of that fractional term outside. This ad-bc expression represents the determinant of matrix P. Some books may use the notation "det" to mean "determinant"

P^{-1} = \frac{1}{\det(P)}\begin{bmatrix}d & -b\\-c & a\end{bmatrix}

or you may see it written as

P^{-1} = \frac{1}{|P|}\begin{bmatrix}d & -b\\-c & a\end{bmatrix}

Those aren't absolute value bars, even if they may look like it.

Based on that, we can see that the determinant must be nonzero in order to compute the inverse of the matrix. Consequently, the determinant must be nonzero in order for Aw = B to have one solution.

If the determinant is 0, then we have two possibilities:

  1. There are infinitely many solutions (aka the system is dependent)
  2. There are no solutions (the system is inconsistent)

So a zero determinant would have to be investigated further as to which outcome would occur.

------------------------------------------

Let's return to the example and compute the inverse (if possible).

A = \begin{bmatrix}2 & -1\\1 & 1\end{bmatrix}\\\\A^{-1} = \frac{1}{2*1 - (-1)*1}\begin{bmatrix}1 & 1\\-1 & 2\end{bmatrix}\\\\A^{-1} = \frac{1}{3}\begin{bmatrix}1 & 1\\-1 & 2\end{bmatrix}\\\\

In this case, the inverse does exist.

This further leads to

w = A^{-1}*B\\\\w = \frac{1}{3}\begin{bmatrix}1 & 1\\-1 & 2\end{bmatrix}*\begin{bmatrix}2\\7\end{bmatrix}\\\\w = \frac{1}{3}\begin{bmatrix}1*2+1*7\\-1*2+2*7\end{bmatrix}\\\\w = \frac{1}{3}\begin{bmatrix}9\\12\end{bmatrix}\\\\w = \begin{bmatrix}(1/3)*9\\(1/3)*12\end{bmatrix}\\\\w = \begin{bmatrix}3\\4\end{bmatrix}\\\\\begin{bmatrix}x\\y\end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix}3\\4\end{bmatrix}\\\\

This shows that the solution is (x,y) = (3,4).

As the other person pointed out, you could use Cramer's Rule to solve this system. Cramer's Rule will involve using determinants and you'll be dividing over determinants. So this is another reason why we cannot have a zero determinant.

You might be interested in
Plsss helpppppppppppp asap​
sdas [7]

Answer:

Q. 2)Perimeter =2(l+b)

So,

2(8x-8 +8x)=80cm(Given in Question)

= 2*16x-8=80cm

16x- 8= 80 divided by 2,

16x=40+8=48

x=48 divided by 16

X=3

Q.1) Perimeter=2(l+b)

2(2x+8 +4x)=76cm(Given in Question)

2* 6x +8=76

6x+8= 76 divided by 2, 38

6x= 38-8, 30

x= 30 divided by 6 = 5

X=5

THANK ME LATER

5 0
3 years ago
For which scatterplot is the correlation strongest?
Degger [83]

Answer:

I believe the second one is correct

Please mark brainliest

Step-by-step explanation:

3 0
4 years ago
What is 8 times 6 times 10 equals
In-s [12.5K]

Answer: 480

Step-by-step explanation:

8x6x10=480

48x10

480

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Need help asap will give brainly
TiliK225 [7]

Answer:

angle 1 and 8 - alternate exterior

6 and 7 - vertical angles

8 and 4 - corresponding

3 and 6 - alternate interior

1 and 5 - corresponding

8 0
3 years ago
An environmental scientist estimated the number of drops of water in two different jugs. He estimated that the smaller jug conta
scoray [572]

Answer:

The difference between the number of drops of water in the larger jug and the number of drops of water in the smaller jug is <u>42,739,999.999999999.</u>

Step-by-step explanation:

Given:

An environmental scientist estimated the number of drops of water in two different jugs. He estimated that the smaller jug contains 8,060,000.000000001 drops of water and the larger jug contains 50,800,000 drops of water.

Now, to find the difference between the number of drops of water in the larger jug and the number of drops of water in the smaller jug.

The smaller jug contains drops of water = 8,060,000.000000001.

The larger jug contains drops of water = 50,800,000.

Now, to get the difference between the number of drops of water we subtract the number of drops of water in the smaller jug from the number of drops of water in the larger jug:

50,800,000-8,060,000.000000001

=42,739,999.999999999

Therefore, the difference between the number of drops of water in the larger jug and the number of drops of water in the smaller jug is 42,739,999.999999999.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The original value of a car is $18,000, and it depreciates (loses value) by 15% each year. What is the value of the car after th
    15·1 answer
  • Find the area of of a regular octagon with side length 18 cm.
    9·1 answer
  • Surface area and volume
    13·1 answer
  • Please help me i will mark brainliest
    12·1 answer
  • I cant figure this out!!!help!!!
    12·1 answer
  • In the formula that gives the circumference of a circle, which quantity is multiplied by 2π ?​
    10·1 answer
  • Mr. Duval bought 21 calculators for his classroom. The total cost was
    13·1 answer
  • What is 1 to the 5th power?​
    13·2 answers
  • JT has coordinates J (-2,-5) and T (2,3). The segment is rotated 180° about the origin to form J'T'. Then J'T' is translated 6 u
    6·1 answer
  • I need this done today whoever gets this correct gets brainliest!!! PLZZ HELPP MEE!!!
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!