1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
timama [110]
3 years ago
5

According to the memorandum, which of the following best explains the root of the tensions between the Soviet Union and the Unit

ed States?
A. The building of the Berlin Wall to divide the former German capital into West and East occupation zones
B. The successful launch of Sputnik I, the first successful artificial satellite, by the Soviet Union
C. The inherent conflict between capitalist and communist economic policies, markets, and trade
D. The Soviet fear of world conflicts due to interference from the United States in communist nations
History
2 answers:
AleksAgata [21]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

D is the correct answer on Edge 2021

Explanation:

The Soviet fear of world conflicts due to interference from the United States in communist nations

I hope this helps :)

mote1985 [20]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

The inherent conflict between capitalist and communist economic policies, markets, and trade.

Explanation:

It explains in the passage "During World War II, the Communist Party of the Soviet Union partially abandoned an approach to international relations which presupposed the inevitability of a clash between communism and capitalism."

You might be interested in
-What is a free-trade agreement? Be sure to include an example.
Pachacha [2.7K]

A free-trade agreement occurs when all participating nations are able to trade with each other without having to pay tariffs.

For example, NAFTA (North American Free Trade Agreement) established by President George H. W. Bush allowed the participating countries to trade without paying tariffs.

~

4 0
3 years ago
How did Alexander gain control of all of Greece??????
TiliK225 [7]

Alexander The Great as he was known, was and excellent, sophisticated military leader considered by many historians as a genius.  Thanks to his greatness, Alexander the Great was able to practically changed the nature of the ancient world by himself in less than 10 years.

When he was in front of his armies he commanded them by example. The fact that he considered himself to be indestructible made him gamble, and  take extreme risks with his own life as well as the soldiers he lead.  

He was born in July of 356 BC in  the city of Pella which was the capital of Macedonia at the time. Also and most importantly,  he was educated by the great philosopher  Aristotle. After his father assassination Philip II in 336 BC, young Alexander took control of the kingdom his father left. Unfortunately, the kingdom was in a very precarious and volatile situation which he quickly was able to put under control by defeating all of those who opposed him at home. Later, he went on to conquer and control the entire Persian Empire.

Thanks to all of these attributes of courage, ingenuity and self confidence,   Alexander the Great was able to control and maintain a firm grip on Greece and the whole Persian Empire.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
TRUE OR FALSE <br> did the United States try to stay out of ww1
zzz [600]

Answer:

true

Explanation:

they stayed netural until 1917

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of these was NOT a target of terrorists on 9/11?
hichkok12 [17]
Wich of what you've got not answer choices
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why should historians avoid oversimplifications when analyzing sources?
Mekhanik [1.2K]

Answer:

The correct answer is <u><em>B) Oversimplifications often ignore complex or contradictory  evidence</em></u>

Explanation:

History is not always easy to study and the further we go back, the further we have to rely on second hand or third hand sources.

For example, in order to study something that happened 20 years ago is fairly easy since it would be recorded either in newspapers, books, or even video.

However, it is not always easy to draw conclusions when we are studying an event that took place 2,000 years ago.

Most of them times we rely on information passed on from generations before until finally someone wrote it down.

While many historians get tempted to Over-simply an event to draw certain conclusions, this should not be practiced as it creates a bias and forces us to study or even research for contradictory evidence. Sometimes, this contradictory evidence can completely change our understanding of the event.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Describes all 5 aspects of total war plus civilians and propaganda
    7·1 answer
  • Which sentence shows correct capitalization?
    8·2 answers
  • Can the military take over your home during a crisis without permission
    7·1 answer
  • What treaty was signed by the countries of western europe, along with canada and the united states, in april of 1949?
    11·1 answer
  • Think about what you read about New Amsterdam: It was a bustling seaport with many different types of people. Write a paragraph
    10·3 answers
  • In the early 1600's, what or who kept many people from leaving France
    8·2 answers
  • Which best describes how Mao’s land policies differed from Deng’s land privatization reforms?
    6·2 answers
  • The founding fathers protected religious freedom in America and guaranteed it’s free exercise by stating that “congress shall ma
    7·1 answer
  • The sharing of power between national and state governments
    10·1 answer
  • Guys please help 50 Points
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!