A free-trade agreement occurs when all participating nations are able to trade with each other without having to pay tariffs.
For example, NAFTA (North American Free Trade Agreement) established by President George H. W. Bush allowed the participating countries to trade without paying tariffs.
~
Alexander The Great as he was known, was and excellent, sophisticated military leader considered by many historians as a genius. Thanks to his greatness, Alexander the Great was able to practically changed the nature of the ancient world by himself in less than 10 years.
When he was in front of his armies he commanded them by example. The fact that he considered himself to be indestructible made him gamble, and take extreme risks with his own life as well as the soldiers he lead.
He was born in July of 356 BC in the city of Pella which was the capital of Macedonia at the time. Also and most importantly, he was educated by the great philosopher Aristotle. After his father assassination Philip II in 336 BC, young Alexander took control of the kingdom his father left. Unfortunately, the kingdom was in a very precarious and volatile situation which he quickly was able to put under control by defeating all of those who opposed him at home. Later, he went on to conquer and control the entire Persian Empire.
Thanks to all of these attributes of courage, ingenuity and self confidence, Alexander the Great was able to control and maintain a firm grip on Greece and the whole Persian Empire.
Answer:
true
Explanation:
they stayed netural until 1917
Wich of what you've got not answer choices
Answer:
The correct answer is <u><em>B) Oversimplifications often ignore complex or contradictory evidence</em></u>
Explanation:
History is not always easy to study and the further we go back, the further we have to rely on second hand or third hand sources.
For example, in order to study something that happened 20 years ago is fairly easy since it would be recorded either in newspapers, books, or even video.
However, it is not always easy to draw conclusions when we are studying an event that took place 2,000 years ago.
Most of them times we rely on information passed on from generations before until finally someone wrote it down.
While many historians get tempted to Over-simply an event to draw certain conclusions, this should not be practiced as it creates a bias and forces us to study or even research for contradictory evidence. Sometimes, this contradictory evidence can completely change our understanding of the event.
