Answer: Any irrational number
Step-by-step explanation:
An irrational number is a number that cannot be expressed as a fraction of two integers where the denominator is different from zero, it is also characterized by the fact that its decimal expression is neither exact nor periodic.
As an example of this we have 
On the other hand, it is necessary to know the following:
-The multiplication of two rational numbers results in a rational number.
-The multiplication of a <u>rational number</u> by <u>any irrational number</u> results in an <u>irrational number.</u>
This means that if we multiply 1/4 (which is rational) by any irrational number, the result will be irrational.
Therefore, the answer is: Any irrational number.
The area of the triangle is 14.1 square meters
<h3>How to determine the triangle area?</h3>
The side lengths are given as:
5m, 6m and 9m
Calculate the semi-perimeter (s) using
s = (5 + 6 + 9)/2
Evaluate
s = 10
The area is then calculated as:
This gives
Evaluate the products
Evaluate the exponent
Area = 14.1
Hence, the area of the triangle is 14.1 square meters
Read more about areas at:
brainly.com/question/27683633
#SPJ1
Constant: A value that doesn't change. Instead, it's a fixed value.
Variable: A symbol (usually a letter) standing in for an unknown numerical value in an equation.
Term: Either a single number or variable, or numbers and variables multiplied together. (Terms are separated by + or − signs, or sometimes by divide.)
Like Terms: Terms whose variables (and their exponents such as the 2 in x2) are the same. In other words, terms that are "like" each other.
Coefficient: A number used to multiply a variable.
Answer:
n = 3.68
Explanation:
We know that:
1 mg is equivalent to 0.0001 dag
To convert 38600 mg to dag, we will simply use cross multiplication as follows:
1 mg ..............> 0.0001 dag
38600 mg ......> n
n = (38600*0.0001) / 1
n = 3.68
Hope this helps :)
Answer:
The correct option is;
Simpson Paradox
Step-by-step explanation:
The phenomenon whereby particular trends are prevalent in small data portions but are not evident or an inverse trend is observe when the portions are joined together is known as Simpson's paradox.
Whereby the data for calculating the bating averages as found online are given as follows;
Season, Derek Jeter David Justice
1995, 12/48 = 0.250 104/411 ≈ 0.253
1996, 183/582 ≈ 0.314 45/140 ≈ 0.321
The overall hits to the overall bats ratio are;
, (183 + 12)/(582 + 48) ≈0.310 (104+45)/(411+140) = 0.27
Which shows that Derek Jeter's overall average was better than Justice's average
